PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IWFV.L vs. XDEV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IWFV.L vs. XDEV.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IWFV.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF) and XDEV.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, from iShares and DWS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWFV.L returned 13.95%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for XDEV.L. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IWFV.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEV.L.

Performance

IWFV.L vs. XDEV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IWFV.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IWFV.L having a 35.48% return and XDEV.L slightly higher at 35.72%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWFV.L having a 13.95% annualized return and XDEV.L not far behind at 13.72%.

IWFV.L

1D
0.18%
1M
16.50%
YTD
35.48%
6M
38.78%
1Y
68.86%
3Y*
27.38%
5Y*
17.65%
10Y*
13.95%

XDEV.L

1D
0.47%
1M
17.08%
YTD
35.72%
6M
39.33%
1Y
69.28%
3Y*
27.40%
5Y*
17.74%
10Y*
13.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWFV.L vs. XDEV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWFV.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF		35.48%30.69%6.85%13.02%0.95%21.60%-6.91%14.69%-9.34%12.04%
XDEV.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C		35.72%30.51%6.79%13.25%1.01%21.67%-6.88%14.56%-9.23%11.91%

Correlation

The correlation between IWFV.L and XDEV.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2014

0.98

The correlation between IWFV.L and XDEV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWFV.L vs. XDEV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IWFV.L
XDEV.L

Technology

33.9%
33.9%

Financial Services

14.8%
14.8%

Industrials

11.3%
11.4%

Healthcare

8.8%
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
7.9%

Communication Services

7.6%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
4.5%

Energy

3.8%
3.8%

Basic Materials

3.0%
3.0%

Utilities

2.5%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

IWFV.L
33.9%
XDEV.L
33.9%

Financial Services

IWFV.L
14.8%
XDEV.L
14.8%

Industrials

IWFV.L
11.3%
XDEV.L
11.4%

Healthcare

IWFV.L
8.8%
XDEV.L
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IWFV.L
7.9%
XDEV.L
7.9%

Communication Services

IWFV.L
7.6%
XDEV.L
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

IWFV.L
4.5%
XDEV.L
4.5%

Energy

IWFV.L
3.8%
XDEV.L
3.8%

Basic Materials

IWFV.L
3.0%
XDEV.L
3.0%

Utilities

IWFV.L
2.5%
XDEV.L
2.6%

Real Estate

IWFV.L
1.8%
XDEV.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF

Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C

Often compared with IWFV.L:
IWFV.L vs. OEFIWFV.L vs. VOOIWFV.L vs. IOOIWFV.L vs. IWQU.LIWFV.L vs. VWRA.LIWFV.L vs. SMGB.LIWFV.L vs. IWDA.L
Often compared with XDEV.L:
XDEV.L vs. XDEM.LXDEV.L vs. VWCE.DEXDEV.L vs. XDEQ.LXDEV.L vs. JPGL.LXDEV.L vs. IWVG.LXDEV.L vs. NASL.LXDEV.L vs. FRXT.L

Return for Risk

IWFV.L vs. XDEV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IWFV.L
IWFV.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IWFV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWFV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWFV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
IWFV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWFV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
XDEV.L
XDEV.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
XDEV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFV.L vs. XDEV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IWFV.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IWFV.LXDEV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
5.11
5.20

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
6.89
7.04

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.97

2.00

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.68

9.96

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

37.44

38.38

-0.95

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWFV.L vs. XDEV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWFV.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.11, which is comparable to the XDEV.L Sharpe Ratio of 5.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWFV.L and XDEV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IWFV.LXDEV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.11

5.20

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.35

1.35

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.91

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.87

-0.07

Drawdowns

IWFV.L vs. XDEV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWFV.L drawdown since its inception was -28.79%, roughly equal to the maximum XDEV.L drawdown of -28.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWFV.L and XDEV.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IWFV.LXDEV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.79%

-28.20%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-6.92%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.82%

-14.00%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.82%

-14.00%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.79%

-28.20%

-0.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.38%

-4.35%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

1.80%

+0.03%

Volatility

IWFV.L vs. XDEV.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IWFV.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L) have volatilities of 5.47% and 5.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IWFV.LXDEV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.47%

5.52%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.17%

10.78%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.42%

13.26%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.09%

13.14%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.10%

15.04%

+0.06%

IWFV.L vs. XDEV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWFV.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEV.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWFV.L vs. XDEV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IWFV.L nor XDEV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.96, IWFV.L and XDEV.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XDEV.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEV.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWFV.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IWFV.L and 0.25% for XDEV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWFV.L and XDEV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer