PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWFV.L vs. TI5G.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWFV.L vs. TI5G.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IWFV.L) and iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (TI5G.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IWFV.L is traded in GBp, while TI5G.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TI5G.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWFV.L achieves a 34.52% return, which is significantly higher than TI5G.L's 2.07% return.


IWFV.L

1D
-0.71%
1M
13.23%
YTD
34.52%
6M
37.29%
1Y
67.80%
3Y*
26.96%
5Y*
17.48%
10Y*
13.69%

TI5G.L

1D
0.04%
1M
0.09%
YTD
2.07%
6M
1.98%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
4.91%
5Y*
2.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWFV.L vs. TI5G.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IWFV.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF
34.52%30.69%6.85%13.02%0.95%21.60%-6.91%14.69%-7.44%
TI5G.L
iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
2.07%5.70%4.60%3.62%-3.69%5.28%4.05%3.05%-0.77%

Correlation

The correlation between IWFV.L and TI5G.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2018

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWFV.L vs. TI5G.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWFV.L
IWFV.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IWFV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWFV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWFV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
IWFV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWFV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

TI5G.L
TI5G.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TI5G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TI5G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
TI5G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
TI5G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TI5G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFV.L vs. TI5G.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IWFV.L) and iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (TI5G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWFV.LTI5G.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.94

1.31

+0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.53

5.26

+4.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

36.85

17.49

+19.37

IWFV.L vs. TI5G.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWFV.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.02, which is higher than the TI5G.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWFV.L and TI5G.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWFV.LTI5G.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.02

1.68

+3.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.33

0.94

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.89

-0.10

Drawdowns

IWFV.L vs. TI5G.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWFV.L drawdown since its inception was -28.79%, which is greater than TI5G.L's maximum drawdown of -5.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWFV.L and TI5G.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWFV.LTI5G.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.79%

-5.63%

-23.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-0.83%

-6.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.82%

-1.55%

-12.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.82%

-5.63%

-8.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-0.08%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.38%

-1.02%

-3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

0.25%

+1.58%

Volatility

IWFV.L vs. TI5G.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IWFV.L) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (TI5G.L) at 0.58%. This indicates that IWFV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TI5G.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWFV.LTI5G.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

0.58%

+4.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.21%

1.69%

+9.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.44%

2.60%

+10.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.10%

3.08%

+10.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.10%

3.23%

+11.87%

IWFV.L vs. TI5G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWFV.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TI5G.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWFV.L vs. TI5G.L - Dividend Comparison

IWFV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TI5G.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IWFV.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TI5G.L
iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
5.85%5.98%6.83%5.19%0.32%0.34%3.06%3.28%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWFV.L and TI5G.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TI5G.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TI5G.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWFV.L.

IWFV.L is categorized as Global Equities, while TI5G.L is Inflation-Protected Bonds. IWFV.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while TI5G.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IWFV.L and 0.12% for TI5G.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWFV.L and TI5G.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer