IWFH vs. IBIT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT).

IWFH and IBIT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWFH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NYSE FactSet Global Virtual Work and Life Index. It was launched on Sep 29, 2020. IBIT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. It was launched on Jan 5, 2024. Both IWFH and IBIT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IWFH vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IWFH vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-5.76%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	-22.62%	-6.41%	99.21%

Returns By Period

IWFH

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIT

• 1D: 1.96%
• 1M: 3.31%
• YTD: -22.62%
• 6M: -40.89%
• 1Y: -17.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWFH vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWFH has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.

IWFH

iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF

IBIT

iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF

Return for Risk

IWFH vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIT

IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 6
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 7
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWFH vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IWFH	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.35	—

Correlation

The correlation between IWFH and IBIT is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

IWFH vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

Neither IWFH nor IBIT has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
IWFH iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.05%	1.83%	0.31%	0.00%	0.18%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IWFH	IBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-49.36%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-49.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-46.11%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-14.13%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	23.09%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IWFH	IBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.99%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.75%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	45.42%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	51.26%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	51.26%	—