PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWDP.L vs. IITU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWDP.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP (IWDP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWDP.L achieves a 6.86% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 23.25% return. Over the past 10 years, IWDP.L has underperformed IITU.L with an annualized return of 3.99%, while IITU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.26% annualized return.


IWDP.L

1D
0.24%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
6.86%
6M
7.06%
1Y
11.51%
3Y*
5.75%
5Y*
1.76%
10Y*
3.99%

IITU.L

1D
-2.08%
1M
14.24%
YTD
23.25%
6M
22.00%
1Y
53.38%
3Y*
30.94%
5Y*
25.50%
10Y*
27.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWDP.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWDP.L
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP
6.86%1.71%1.22%4.00%-14.93%26.93%-12.50%17.31%-0.09%1.37%
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
23.25%14.44%40.85%50.70%-20.63%35.67%38.34%44.21%4.28%25.57%

Correlation

The correlation between IWDP.L and IITU.L is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between IWDP.L and IITU.L has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IWDP.L vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWDP.L
IITU.L

Real Estate

100.0%

-

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.0%

Technology

-

99.6%

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

IWDP.L
100.0%
IITU.L

-

Financial Services

IWDP.L
0.1%
IITU.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

IWDP.L
0.0%
IITU.L

-

Basic Materials

IWDP.L

-

IITU.L

-

Communication Services

IWDP.L

-

IITU.L

-

Consumer Defensive

IWDP.L

-

IITU.L

-

Energy

IWDP.L

-

IITU.L
0.1%

Healthcare

IWDP.L

-

IITU.L

-

Industrials

IWDP.L

-

IITU.L
0.0%

Technology

IWDP.L

-

IITU.L
99.6%

Utilities

IWDP.L

-

IITU.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWDP.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWDP.L
IWDP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IWDP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWDP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWDP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IWDP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWDP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

IITU.L
IITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
IITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWDP.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP (IWDP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWDP.LIITU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.44

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

3.17

-1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.13

8.17

-4.04

IWDP.L vs. IITU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWDP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the IITU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWDP.L and IITU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWDP.LIITU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

2.71

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

1.16

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

1.28

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

1.23

-0.97

Drawdowns

IWDP.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWDP.L drawdown since its inception was -58.29%, which is greater than IITU.L's maximum drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWDP.L and IITU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWDP.LIITU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.29%

-28.03%

-30.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-16.76%

+8.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.50%

-28.03%

+11.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.31%

-28.03%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.66%

-28.03%

-7.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

-2.89%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.23%

-5.14%

-6.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

6.51%

-3.73%

Volatility

IWDP.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP (IWDP.L) is 3.00%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that IWDP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWDP.LIITU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

7.01%

-4.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.45%

14.45%

-6.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.89%

19.60%

-8.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.76%

21.94%

-8.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

21.31%

-5.77%

IWDP.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWDP.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWDP.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison

IWDP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, while IITU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWDP.L
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) GBP
3.03%3.13%3.17%3.14%3.56%2.17%3.11%3.03%3.82%3.05%2.96%2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWDP.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IWDP.L.

IWDP.L is categorized as REIT, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. IWDP.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IWDP.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWDP.L and IITU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer