PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWDP.AS vs. CSPX.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWDP.AS vs. CSPX.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWDP.AS) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWDP.AS achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly lower than CSPX.AS's 11.63% return. Over the past 10 years, IWDP.AS has underperformed CSPX.AS with an annualized return of 2.95%, while CSPX.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 15.02% annualized return.


IWDP.AS

1D
0.41%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
7.91%
6M
8.11%
1Y
8.45%
3Y*
5.65%
5Y*
1.62%
10Y*
2.95%

CSPX.AS

1D
-0.30%
1M
6.08%
YTD
11.63%
6M
11.61%
1Y
25.69%
3Y*
19.12%
5Y*
14.80%
10Y*
15.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWDP.AS vs. CSPX.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWDP.AS
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
7.91%-3.33%6.79%5.38%-19.61%36.11%-17.19%23.60%-1.01%-2.62%
CSPX.AS
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
11.63%4.00%33.87%22.28%-14.24%40.26%7.72%32.99%-0.36%7.13%

Correlation

The correlation between IWDP.AS and CSPX.AS is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2014

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between IWDP.AS and CSPX.AS has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWDP.AS vs. CSPX.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWDP.AS
IWDP.AS Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
IWDP.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWDP.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWDP.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
IWDP.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWDP.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

CSPX.AS
CSPX.AS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CSPX.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSPX.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWDP.AS vs. CSPX.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWDP.AS) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWDP.ASCSPX.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.42

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

3.57

-2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.24

12.76

-9.52

IWDP.AS vs. CSPX.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWDP.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the CSPX.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWDP.AS and CSPX.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWDP.ASCSPX.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

2.25

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.96

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.92

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.93

-0.76

Drawdowns

IWDP.AS vs. CSPX.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWDP.AS drawdown since its inception was -70.13%, which is greater than CSPX.AS's maximum drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWDP.AS and CSPX.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWDP.ASCSPX.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.13%

-33.65%

-36.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.55%

-7.11%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.92%

-23.37%

+3.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.88%

-23.37%

-6.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.55%

-33.65%

-7.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.03%

-0.30%

-6.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.78%

-4.29%

-11.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

2.00%

+0.59%

Volatility

IWDP.AS vs. CSPX.AS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWDP.AS) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS) at 2.64%. This indicates that IWDP.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPX.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWDP.ASCSPX.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

2.64%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.15%

7.37%

+0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.90%

11.36%

-0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.41%

15.13%

-0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.98%

16.05%

-0.07%

IWDP.AS vs. CSPX.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWDP.AS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPX.AS's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWDP.AS vs. CSPX.AS - Dividend Comparison

IWDP.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, while CSPX.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSPX.AS
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWDP.AS
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
3.01%3.20%3.10%3.16%3.71%2.11%3.18%2.91%3.87%3.11%3.07%2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWDP.AS and CSPX.AS have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSPX.AS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSPX.AS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IWDP.AS.

IWDP.AS is categorized as REIT, while CSPX.AS is S&P 500. IWDP.AS tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while CSPX.AS tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IWDP.AS and 0.07% for CSPX.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWDP.AS and CSPX.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer