PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWDL vs. SHRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IWDL vs. SHRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN (IWDL) and Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IWDL vs. SHRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IWDL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN
2.06%25.02%20.68%19.22%
SHRT
Gotham Short Strategies ETF
-2.73%-0.91%-1.44%-5.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWDL achieves a 2.06% return, which is significantly higher than SHRT's -2.73% return.


IWDL

1D
4.14%
1M
-9.86%
YTD
2.06%
6M
8.41%
1Y
23.96%
3Y*
20.71%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*

SHRT

1D
-1.51%
1M
4.54%
YTD
-2.73%
6M
-1.63%
1Y
-8.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IWDL vs. SHRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWDL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than SHRT's 1.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IWDL vs. SHRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWDL
IWDL Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IWDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWDL Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
IWDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWDL Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SHRT
SHRT Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
SHRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHRT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
SHRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHRT Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWDL vs. SHRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN (IWDL) and Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWDLSHRTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.71

-0.61

+1.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

-0.84

+2.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.91

+0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

-0.49

+1.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.17

-0.89

+6.07

IWDL vs. SHRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWDL Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the SHRT Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWDL and SHRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWDLSHRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

-0.61

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

-0.36

+0.81

Correlation

The correlation between IWDL and SHRT is -0.46. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

IWDL vs. SHRT - Dividend Comparison

IWDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.


TTM202520242023
IWDL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHRT
Gotham Short Strategies ETF
0.07%0.07%0.85%0.27%

Drawdowns

IWDL vs. SHRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWDL drawdown since its inception was -37.95%, which is greater than SHRT's maximum drawdown of -18.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWDL and SHRT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IWDLSHRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.95%

-18.97%

-18.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.92%

-17.65%

-6.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.95%

-12.77%

+2.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.91%

-7.21%

-3.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.12%

9.62%

-4.50%

Volatility

IWDL vs. SHRT - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN (IWDL) has a higher volatility of 8.82% compared to Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT) at 6.06%. This indicates that IWDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IWDLSHRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.82%

6.06%

+2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.05%

10.51%

+7.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.77%

14.59%

+19.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.32%

12.66%

+17.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.24%

12.66%

+17.58%