IWDG.L vs. XLKQ.L

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

IWDG.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF) and XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - IWDG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index, while XLKQ.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IWDG.L returned 11.81%/yr vs 25.01%/yr for XLKQ.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWDG.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKQ.L.

Performance

IWDG.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWDG.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWDG.L achieves a 8.77% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 18.20% return.

IWDG.L

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 8.77%
• 6M: 10.04%
• 1Y: 24.75%
• 3Y*: 19.32%
• 5Y*: 11.81%
• 10Y*: —

XLKQ.L

• 1D: 2.39%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: 18.20%
• 6M: 18.52%
• 1Y: 46.40%
• 3Y*: 30.77%
• 5Y*: 25.01%
• 10Y*: 26.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWDG.L vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IWDG.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF	8.77%	18.71%	21.37%	23.13%	-17.43%	24.30%	11.80%	24.91%	-8.73%	10.33%
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc	18.20%	15.76%	44.03%	51.84%	-20.58%	36.28%	37.93%	44.38%	2.54%	13.91%

Correlation

The correlation between IWDG.L and XLKQ.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2017	0.74

The correlation between IWDG.L and XLKQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWDG.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWDG.L	XLKQ.L
Technology	30.5%	91.2%
Financial Services	15.4%	7.3%
Industrials	10.8%	1.5%
Healthcare	8.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.8%	-
Communication Services	8.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	-
Energy	4.0%	-
Basic Materials	3.3%	-
Utilities	2.8%	-
Real Estate	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

IWDG.L vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWDG.L

IWDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
IWDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
IWDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
IWDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IWDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
IWDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 78

XLKQ.L

XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 68
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 73
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWDG.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWDG.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWDG.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	2.25	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	2.90	+0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.37	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	2.68	+0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.33	6.86	+6.46

IWDG.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWDG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWDG.L and XLKQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IWDG.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWDG.L drawdown since its inception was -34.20%, smaller than the maximum XLKQ.L drawdown of -38.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWDG.L and XLKQ.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWDG.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.20%	-38.43%	+4.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.64%	-16.76%	+9.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.57%	-28.74%	+11.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.82%	-28.74%	+5.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.49%	-7.23%	+5.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.61%	-8.07%	+3.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	6.57%	-4.77%

Volatility

IWDG.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWDG.L) is 3.70%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a volatility of 8.58%. This indicates that IWDG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWDG.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.70%	8.58%	-4.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.06%	15.29%	-6.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.78%	19.96%	-8.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.89%	26.22%	-11.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.94%	23.42%	-7.48%

IWDG.L vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWDG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWDG.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison

IWDG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while XLKQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IWDG.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF	1.04%	1.11%	1.24%	1.42%	1.74%	1.19%	1.35%	1.83%	2.14%	0.61%
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWDG.L and XLKQ.L in my portfolio?

IWDG.L and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IWDG.L or XLKQ.L?

On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWDG.L or XLKQ.L?

XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWDG.L.

What is the main difference between IWDG.L and XLKQ.L?

IWDG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while XLKQ.L is Technology Equities. IWDG.L tracks MSCI World Index, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IWDG.L and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.