PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWDG.L vs. PRWU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IWDG.L vs. PRWU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWDG.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IWDG.L vs. PRWU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IWDG.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF
-2.02%18.71%21.37%23.13%0.98%
PRWU.L
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)
0.00%0.00%20.63%18.25%1.23%
Different Trading Currencies

IWDG.L is traded in GBp, while PRWU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PRWU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


IWDG.L

1D
2.60%
1M
-3.53%
YTD
-2.02%
6M
1.65%
1Y
19.24%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
10.70%
10Y*

PRWU.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IWDG.L vs. PRWU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWDG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWU.L's 0.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IWDG.L vs. PRWU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWDG.L
IWDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
IWDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IWDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

PRWU.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWDG.L vs. PRWU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWDG.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWDG.LPRWU.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.77

IWDG.L vs. PRWU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWDG.LPRWU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

Correlation

The correlation between IWDG.L and PRWU.L is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IWDG.L vs. PRWU.L - Dividend Comparison

IWDG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while PRWU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWDG.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF
1.12%1.11%1.24%1.42%1.74%1.19%1.35%1.83%2.14%0.61%
PRWU.L
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IWDG.L vs. PRWU.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IWDG.LPRWU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

Volatility

IWDG.L vs. PRWU.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IWDG.LPRWU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.00%