IVVW vs. LQTI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI).

IVVW and LQTI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IVVW is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Enhanced 1% OTM BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Mar 14, 2024. LQTI is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Feb 11, 2025.

Performance

IVVW vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IVVW vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	-1.13%	7.63%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	-0.44%	6.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVVW achieves a -1.13% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's -0.44% return.

IVVW

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: -2.43%
• YTD: -1.13%
• 6M: 4.20%
• 1Y: 13.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQTI

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -1.73%
• YTD: -0.44%
• 6M: -0.03%
• 1Y: 4.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVVW vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVVW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.

LQTI

FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF

IVVW

iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF

Return for Risk

IVVW vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVVW

IVVW Risk / Return Rank: 57
IVVW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
IVVW Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
IVVW Omega Ratio Rank: 73
IVVW Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
IVVW Martin Ratio Rank: 70

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 36
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 30
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVVW vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IVVW	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	0.74	+0.16
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	1.02	+0.39
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.14	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	1.37	-0.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.59	4.15	+3.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IVVW vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVVW Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the LQTI Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVVW and LQTI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IVVW	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	0.74	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	0.90	-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between IVVW and LQTI is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

IVVW vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

IVVW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.78%, more than LQTI's 9.07% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	19.78%	18.55%	13.72%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.07%	7.01%	0.00%

Drawdowns

IVVW vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVVW drawdown since its inception was -16.79%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVVW and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVVW	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.79%	-3.41%	-13.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.21%	-3.41%	-7.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.90%	-2.03%	-0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.87%	-0.78%	-1.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.88%	1.12%	+0.76%

Volatility

IVVW vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) at 2.66%. This indicates that IVVW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVVW	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.54%	2.66%	+1.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.63%	3.87%	+2.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.56%	6.23%	+9.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.10%	6.11%	+6.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.10%	6.11%	+6.99%