PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVVM vs. HOCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVVM vs. HOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IVVM

1D
-0.22%
1M
1.95%
YTD
5.95%
6M
6.15%
1Y
16.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOCT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVVM vs. HOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVVM vs. HOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVVM
IVVM Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IVVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVVM Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
IVVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVVM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

HOCT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVVM vs. HOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVVMHOCTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.34

IVVM vs. HOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVVMHOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.49

Drawdowns

IVVM vs. HOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVVM drawdown since its inception was -11.62%, which is greater than HOCT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVVM and HOCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVVMHOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.62%

0.00%

-11.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

0.00%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.92%

0.00%

-0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

Volatility

IVVM vs. HOCT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVVMHOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.04%

0.00%

+7.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.62%

0.00%

+9.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.62%

0.00%

+9.62%

IVVM vs. HOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVVM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than HOCT's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVVM vs. HOCT - Dividend Comparison

IVVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while HOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
HOCT
Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVVM
iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF
0.65%0.68%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, IVVM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IVVM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for HOCT.

IVVM has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for HOCT.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IVVM and 0.79% for HOCT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVVM and HOCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer