IVV vs. SSO
IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while SSO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVV returned 15.39%/yr vs 23.84%/yr for SSO. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IVV charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.
Performance
IVV vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVV achieves a 8.48% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 13.90% return. Over the past 10 years, IVV has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of 15.39%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 23.84% annualized return.
IVV
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 8.48%
- 6M
- 7.66%
- 1Y
- 24.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.99%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- 15.39%
SSO
- 1D
- 3.39%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 13.90%
- 6M
- 11.75%
- 1Y
- 43.37%
- 3Y*
- 34.28%
- 5Y*
- 18.32%
- 10Y*
- 23.84%
IVV vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 8.48% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 13.90% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 60.57% | 21.54% | 63.45% | -14.60% | 44.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVV and SSO is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006 | 0.99 |
The correlation between IVV and SSO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVV vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVV
SSO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
IVV
SSO
Financial Services
IVV
SSO
Communication Services
IVV
SSO
Consumer Cyclical
IVV
SSO
Healthcare
IVV
SSO
Industrials
IVV
SSO
Consumer Defensive
IVV
SSO
Energy
IVV
SSO
Utilities
IVV
SSO
Real Estate
IVV
SSO
Basic Materials
IVV
SSO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVV vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank
IVV
SSO
IVV vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVV | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.31 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 2.40 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.34 | 10.28 | +2.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVV vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, smaller than the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and SSO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVV | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.25% | -84.67% | +29.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -18.17% | +9.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.75% | -35.21% | +16.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.53% | -46.73% | +22.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.90% | -59.34% | +25.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -5.92% | +3.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.77% | -19.55% | +8.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 4.23% | -2.27% |
Volatility
IVV vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is 4.37%, while ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) has a volatility of 8.75%. This indicates that IVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVV | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 8.75% | -4.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.59% | 19.19% | -9.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.27% | 24.53% | -12.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 33.79% | -16.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 35.95% | -17.87% |
IVV vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVV vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, more than SSO's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.09% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.65% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, IVV and SSO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SSO has higher volatility (8.75%) compared to IVV (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs SSO's -84.67%.
On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 23.84% vs 15.39% for IVV. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 23.84% return vs 15.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SSO.
IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.65% for SSO.
IVV is categorized as S&P 500, while SSO is Leveraged Equities. IVV tracks S&P 500 Index, while SSO tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for IVV and 0.87% for SSO.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVV and SSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer