PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVV vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVV vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVV achieves a 8.46% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's -0.02% return. Over the past 10 years, IVV has outperformed GLD with an annualized return of 15.21%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.80% annualized return.


IVV

1D
-2.62%
1M
0.47%
YTD
8.46%
6M
8.18%
1Y
25.86%
3Y*
21.53%
5Y*
13.39%
10Y*
15.21%

GLD

1D
-3.65%
1M
-8.06%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
2.54%
1Y
28.10%
3Y*
29.53%
5Y*
17.47%
10Y*
12.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVV vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
8.46%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-0.02%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between IVV and GLD is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2004

0.07

The correlation between IVV and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (10 years) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IVV vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVV
GLD

Technology

35.6%

-

Financial Services

11.8%

-

Communication Services

11.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
100.0%

Technology

IVV
35.6%
GLD

-

Financial Services

IVV
11.8%
GLD

-

Communication Services

IVV
11.2%
GLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

IVV
10.1%
GLD

-

Healthcare

IVV
8.5%
GLD

-

Industrials

IVV
8.3%
GLD

-

Consumer Defensive

IVV
4.9%
GLD

-

Energy

IVV
3.5%
GLD

-

Utilities

IVV
2.4%
GLD

-

Real Estate

IVV
1.9%
GLD

-

Basic Materials

IVV
1.8%
GLD
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVV vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVV vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVVGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.21

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

1.40

+1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.52

3.56

+9.96

IVV vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVV Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVV and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVVGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

1.05

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.97

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.80

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.59

-0.14

Drawdowns

IVV vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVVGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.25%

-45.56%

-9.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-20.10%

+11.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.75%

-20.10%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.53%

-21.03%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

-22.00%

-11.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.90%

-20.10%

+17.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.78%

-16.16%

+5.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

7.91%

-5.99%

Volatility

IVV vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is 3.78%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that IVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVVGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

5.66%

-1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

23.47%

-14.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

26.86%

-14.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

18.07%

-1.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.07%

16.00%

+2.07%

IVV vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVV vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.09%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVV and GLD have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLD has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to IVV (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs GLD's -45.56%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.21% vs 12.80% for GLD. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.21% return vs 12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

IVV is categorized as S&P 500, while GLD is Gold. IVV tracks S&P 500 Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for IVV and 0.40% for GLD.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVV and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer