PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVV vs. FLIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVV vs. FLIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVV achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly higher than FLIN's -12.18% return.


IVV

1D
0.24%
1M
0.23%
YTD
8.72%
6M
8.76%
1Y
24.89%
3Y*
21.44%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
15.32%

FLIN

1D
-0.24%
1M
-4.99%
YTD
-12.18%
6M
-10.48%
1Y
-13.37%
3Y*
5.55%
5Y*
3.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVV vs. FLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
8.72%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-1.09%
FLIN
Franklin FTSE India ETF
-12.18%2.40%10.33%20.58%-7.96%24.96%14.50%4.77%-6.70%

Correlation

The correlation between IVV and FLIN is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2018

0.49

The correlation between IVV and FLIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVV vs. FLIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVV
FLIN

Technology

35.6%
8.4%

Financial Services

11.8%
27.2%

Communication Services

11.2%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
12.0%

Healthcare

8.5%
6.5%

Industrials

8.3%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.8%

Energy

3.5%
9.5%

Utilities

2.4%
5.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.3%

Basic Materials

1.8%
9.2%

Technology

IVV
35.6%
FLIN
8.4%

Financial Services

IVV
11.8%
FLIN
27.2%

Communication Services

IVV
11.2%
FLIN
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IVV
10.1%
FLIN
12.0%

Healthcare

IVV
8.5%
FLIN
6.5%

Industrials

IVV
8.3%
FLIN
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

IVV
4.9%
FLIN
5.8%

Energy

IVV
3.5%
FLIN
9.5%

Utilities

IVV
2.4%
FLIN
5.3%

Real Estate

IVV
1.9%
FLIN
1.3%

Basic Materials

IVV
1.8%
FLIN
9.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVV vs. FLIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FLIN
FLIN Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FLIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLIN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FLIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLIN Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVV vs. FLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVVFLINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

0.86

+0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

-0.71

+3.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.97

-1.73

+14.70

IVV vs. FLIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVV Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the FLIN Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVV and FLIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVVFLINDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

-0.90

+2.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.23

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.26

+0.19

Drawdowns

IVV vs. FLIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, which is greater than FLIN's maximum drawdown of -41.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and FLIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVVFLINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.25%

-41.90%

-13.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-18.79%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.75%

-22.85%

+4.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.53%

-22.85%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.67%

-19.15%

+16.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.77%

-8.02%

-2.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

7.73%

-5.81%

Volatility

IVV vs. FLIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is 3.77%, while Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that IVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVVFLINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

5.06%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

12.90%

-3.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.08%

14.98%

-2.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

15.76%

+1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.07%

20.44%

-2.37%

IVV vs. FLIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FLIN's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IVV vs. FLIN - Dividend Comparison

IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, more than FLIN's 0.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLIN
Franklin FTSE India ETF
0.64%0.56%1.58%0.73%0.73%2.26%0.68%0.90%0.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.09%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVV and FLIN have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLIN has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to IVV (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs FLIN's -41.90%.

On 5-year performance, IVV leads with 13.50% vs 3.56% for FLIN. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IVV has performed better with a 13.50% return vs 3.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLIN.

IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.64% for FLIN.

IVV is categorized as S&P 500, while FLIN is Asia Pacific Equities. IVV tracks S&P 500 Index, while FLIN tracks FTSE India RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for IVV and 0.19% for FLIN.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVV and FLIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer