IVV vs. DIV
IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) and DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while DIV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVV returned 15.47%/yr vs 4.30%/yr for DIV. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVV charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DIV.
Performance
IVV vs. DIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVV achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly lower than DIV's 14.48% return. Over the past 10 years, IVV has outperformed DIV with an annualized return of 15.47%, while DIV has yielded a comparatively lower 4.30% annualized return.
IVV
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.42%
- 10Y*
- 15.47%
DIV
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 14.48%
- 6M
- 13.33%
- 1Y
- 16.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- 4.30%
IVV vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 9.08% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 14.48% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVV and DIV is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IVV and DIV has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IVV vs. DIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVV
DIV
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
IVV
DIV
-
Financial Services
IVV
DIV
Communication Services
IVV
DIV
Consumer Cyclical
IVV
DIV
Healthcare
IVV
DIV
Industrials
IVV
DIV
Consumer Defensive
IVV
DIV
Energy
IVV
DIV
Utilities
IVV
DIV
Real Estate
IVV
DIV
Basic Materials
IVV
DIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVV vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank
IVV
DIV
IVV vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVV | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.26 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 3.02 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.43 | 8.43 | +4.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVV vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, roughly equal to the maximum DIV drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and DIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVV | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.25% | -52.74% | -2.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -5.23% | -3.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.75% | -12.33% | -6.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.53% | -21.14% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.90% | -52.74% | +18.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -0.73% | -1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.77% | -7.01% | -3.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 1.88% | +0.09% |
Volatility
IVV vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) at 3.07%. This indicates that IVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVV | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 3.07% | +1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.59% | 7.08% | +2.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 10.32% | +1.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 13.69% | +3.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 17.98% | +0.10% |
IVV vs. DIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DIV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVV vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison
IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than DIV's 6.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.61% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.08% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVV and DIV have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVV has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to DIV (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs DIV's -52.74%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.47% vs 4.30% for DIV. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.47% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 1.08% for IVV.
IVV is categorized as S&P 500, while DIV is Mid Cap Value Equities. IVV tracks S&P 500 Index, while DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for IVV and 0.45% for DIV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVV and DIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer