IVOL vs. OBOR
IVOL (Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF) and OBOR (KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVOL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by CICC, while OBOR is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Global China Infrastructure Exposure. IVOL is actively managed, while OBOR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IVOL returned -5.77%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for OBOR. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IVOL charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for OBOR.
Performance
IVOL vs. OBOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOL achieves a -6.33% return, which is significantly lower than OBOR's 3.11% return.
IVOL
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -3.62%
- YTD
- -6.33%
- 6M
- -7.21%
- 1Y
- -5.59%
- 3Y*
- -3.54%
- 5Y*
- -5.77%
- 10Y*
- —
OBOR
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 3.11%
- 6M
- 6.70%
- 1Y
- 23.10%
- 3Y*
- 11.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.84%
- 10Y*
- —
IVOL vs. OBOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | -6.33% | 11.97% | -11.07% | -5.18% | -12.69% | -0.31% | 14.56% | 3.23% |
OBOR KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF | 3.11% | 27.86% | 8.55% | -7.91% | -21.96% | 17.06% | 13.47% | 13.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOL and OBOR is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2019 | 0.09 |
IVOL vs. OBOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVOL
OBOR
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
IVOL
OBOR
Basic Materials
IVOL
-
OBOR
Communication Services
IVOL
-
OBOR
Consumer Cyclical
IVOL
-
OBOR
Consumer Defensive
IVOL
-
OBOR
-
Energy
IVOL
-
OBOR
Healthcare
IVOL
-
OBOR
Industrials
IVOL
-
OBOR
Real Estate
IVOL
-
OBOR
-
Technology
IVOL
-
OBOR
-
Utilities
IVOL
-
OBOR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOL vs. OBOR — Risk / Return Rank
IVOL
OBOR
IVOL vs. OBOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) and KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVOL | OBOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.26 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 2.22 | -2.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | 5.62 | -6.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVOL | OBOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.81 | 1.44 | -2.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 | 0.05 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.20 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
IVOL vs. OBOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOL drawdown since its inception was -31.16%, smaller than the maximum OBOR drawdown of -41.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOL and OBOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOL | OBOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.16% | -41.54% | +10.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.81% | -10.47% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.63% | -18.06% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.62% | -34.00% | +3.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.33% | -9.03% | -17.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.30% | -15.97% | +2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 4.12% | +0.26% |
Volatility
IVOL vs. OBOR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) is 1.07%, while KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) has a volatility of 6.38%. This indicates that IVOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OBOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOL | OBOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 6.38% | -5.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.44% | 13.84% | -9.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.89% | 16.10% | -9.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.84% | 16.05% | -3.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.99% | 18.52% | -6.53% |
IVOL vs. OBOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than OBOR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVOL vs. OBOR - Dividend Comparison
IVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than OBOR's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | 3.89% | 3.61% | 3.83% | 3.73% | 3.92% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 2.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OBOR KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF | 1.88% | 1.94% | 3.87% | 3.40% | 4.75% | 3.26% | 2.04% | 4.33% | 0.02% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVOL and OBOR have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OBOR has higher volatility (6.38%) compared to IVOL (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOL dropped -31.16% vs OBOR's -41.54%.
On 5-year performance, OBOR leads with 0.84% vs -5.77% for IVOL. On fees, OBOR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, IVOL has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OBOR has performed better with a 0.84% return vs -5.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OBOR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IVOL.
IVOL has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 1.88% for OBOR.
IVOL is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while OBOR is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IVOL and 0.79% for OBOR.
OBOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOL and OBOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer