IVOL vs. FFUT
IVOL (Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF) and FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVOL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by CICC, while FFUT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IVOL returned -7.39% vs 18.72% for FFUT. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. IVOL charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFUT.
Performance
IVOL vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOL achieves a -8.37% return, which is significantly lower than FFUT's 8.83% return.
IVOL
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -3.04%
- YTD
- -8.37%
- 6M
- -7.51%
- 1Y
- -7.39%
- 3Y*
- -2.64%
- 5Y*
- -5.63%
- 10Y*
- —
FFUT
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -2.69%
- YTD
- 8.83%
- 6M
- 9.28%
- 1Y
- 18.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVOL vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | -8.37% | 0.50% |
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF | 8.83% | 8.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOL and FFUT is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOL vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank
IVOL
FFUT
IVOL vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVOL | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.32 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 4.35 | -4.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.48 | 14.55 | -16.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVOL vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOL drawdown since its inception was -31.16%, which is greater than FFUT's maximum drawdown of -4.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOL and FFUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOL | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.16% | -4.33% | -26.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.08% | -4.33% | -7.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.94% | -4.33% | -23.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.39% | -0.96% | -12.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.99% | 1.29% | +3.70% |
Volatility
IVOL vs. FFUT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) is 2.57%, while Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that IVOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOL | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.57% | 2.93% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.97% | 8.97% | -4.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.05% | 11.22% | -4.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.85% | 11.02% | +1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.98% | 11.02% | +0.96% |
IVOL vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVOL vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison
IVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than FFUT's 1.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF | 1.92% | 2.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | 3.98% | 3.61% | 3.83% | 3.73% | 3.92% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVOL and FFUT have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFUT has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to IVOL (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOL dropped -31.16% vs FFUT's -4.33%.
On 1-year performance, FFUT leads with 18.72% vs -7.39% for IVOL. On fees, FFUT is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, IVOL has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FFUT has performed better with a 18.72% return vs -7.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FFUT is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IVOL.
IVOL has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 1.92% for FFUT.
IVOL is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while FFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: CICC and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IVOL and 0.80% for FFUT.
FFUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOL and FFUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer