PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVNQX vs. VUSSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IVNQX vs. VUSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (IVNQX) and Invesco Quality Income Fund Class R6 (VUSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IVNQX vs. VUSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IVNQX
Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund
-5.88%20.77%25.43%54.62%-32.05%26.75%8.46%
VUSSX
Invesco Quality Income Fund Class R6
0.13%8.61%1.38%4.81%-12.14%-1.37%1.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVNQX achieves a -5.88% return, which is significantly lower than VUSSX's 0.13% return.


IVNQX

1D
3.42%
1M
-4.94%
YTD
-5.88%
6M
-4.11%
1Y
22.78%
3Y*
22.26%
5Y*
12.94%
10Y*

VUSSX

1D
0.30%
1M
-1.49%
YTD
0.13%
6M
1.40%
1Y
5.09%
3Y*
3.97%
5Y*
0.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IVNQX vs. VUSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVNQX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than VUSSX's 0.53% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IVNQX vs. VUSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVNQX
IVNQX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IVNQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVNQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVNQX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
IVNQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVNQX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

VUSSX
VUSSX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
VUSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
VUSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVNQX vs. VUSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (IVNQX) and Invesco Quality Income Fund Class R6 (VUSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVNQXVUSSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

1.11

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.65

1.59

+0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.20

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

2.24

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.05

6.13

-0.08

IVNQX vs. VUSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVNQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the VUSSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVNQX and VUSSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVNQXVUSSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

1.11

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.03

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.30

+0.33

Correlation

The correlation between IVNQX and VUSSX is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

IVNQX vs. VUSSX - Dividend Comparison

IVNQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than VUSSX's 3.43% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVNQX
Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund
1.39%1.31%0.72%0.54%0.73%0.84%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUSSX
Invesco Quality Income Fund Class R6
3.43%3.69%4.30%3.20%3.37%3.49%4.00%4.09%4.27%2.78%

Drawdowns

IVNQX vs. VUSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVNQX drawdown since its inception was -34.83%, which is greater than VUSSX's maximum drawdown of -18.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVNQX and VUSSX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IVNQXVUSSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.83%

-18.43%

-16.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.56%

-2.95%

-9.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.83%

-17.85%

-16.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.94%

-1.97%

-6.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.45%

-4.60%

-3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

1.08%

+2.31%

Volatility

IVNQX vs. VUSSX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (IVNQX) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to Invesco Quality Income Fund Class R6 (VUSSX) at 1.82%. This indicates that IVNQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IVNQXVUSSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.55%

1.82%

+4.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.88%

2.79%

+10.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.53%

4.92%

+17.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.51%

6.42%

+16.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.56%

5.17%

+17.39%