IVG.MI vs. HWM
IVG.MI (Iveco Group NV) and HWM (Howmet Aerospace Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — IVG.MI in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery, HWM in Specialty Industrial Machinery. Over the past 3 years, IVG.MI returned 40.82%/yr vs 73.33%/yr for HWM. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IVG.MI vs. HWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IVG.MI is traded in EUR, while HWM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HWM values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVG.MI achieves a 5.22% return, which is significantly lower than HWM's 25.40% return.
IVG.MI
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 5.22%
- 6M
- 5.92%
- 1Y
- 14.75%
- 3Y*
- 40.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HWM
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 25.40%
- 6M
- 33.42%
- 1Y
- 43.30%
- 3Y*
- 73.33%
- 5Y*
- 50.29%
- 10Y*
- 31.47%
IVG.MI vs. HWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVG.MI Iveco Group NV | 5.22% | 106.07% | 16.74% | 46.56% | -45.01% |
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 25.40% | 65.65% | 116.09% | 33.71% | 29.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVG.MI and HWM is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2022 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVG.MI vs. HWM — Risk / Return Rank
IVG.MI
HWM
IVG.MI vs. HWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Iveco Group NV (IVG.MI) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVG.MI | HWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.25 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 3.06 | -2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.59 | 7.24 | -3.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVG.MI | HWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 1.42 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.23 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
IVG.MI vs. HWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVG.MI drawdown since its inception was -58.44%, smaller than the maximum HWM drawdown of -85.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVG.MI and HWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVG.MI | HWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.44% | -85.31% | +26.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.08% | -14.22% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.37% | -23.37% | -18.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | -6.31% | +5.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.05% | -47.66% | +23.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 6.00% | -1.94% |
Volatility
IVG.MI vs. HWM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Iveco Group NV (IVG.MI) is 0.55%, while Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) has a volatility of 9.73%. This indicates that IVG.MI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVG.MI | HWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.55% | 9.73% | -9.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.27% | 23.45% | -20.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.78% | 30.57% | -9.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.88% | 31.87% | +8.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.88% | 39.81% | +0.07% |
Dividends
IVG.MI vs. HWM - Dividend Comparison
IVG.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 41.82%, more than HWM's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc. | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.31% | 0.25% | 0.13% | 0.05% | 0.39% | 1.42% | 0.88% | 40.49% | 1.22% |
IVG.MI Iveco Group NV | 41.82% | 1.76% | 2.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
IVG.MI vs. HWM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Iveco Group NV and Howmet Aerospace Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
IVG.MI and HWM have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for IVG.MI and HWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer