PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVEP vs. SUPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVEP vs. SUPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF (IVEP) and ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF (SUPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IVEP

1D
-2.80%
1M
-7.80%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SUPL

1D
2.34%
1M
3.44%
6M
17.17%
YTD
22.63%
1Y
30.20%
3Y*
10.66%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVEP vs. SUPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IVEP and SUPL is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026

0.28

IVEP vs. SUPL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVEP
SUPL

Industrials

43.6%
58.3%

Utilities

22.5%
2.8%

Energy

13.0%
4.6%

Real Estate

10.9%

-

Technology

7.7%
1.8%

Basic Materials

2.4%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

4.1%

Industrials

IVEP
43.6%
SUPL
58.3%

Utilities

IVEP
22.5%
SUPL
2.8%

Energy

IVEP
13.0%
SUPL
4.6%

Real Estate

IVEP
10.9%
SUPL

-

Technology

IVEP
7.7%
SUPL
1.8%

Basic Materials

IVEP
2.4%
SUPL

-

Communication Services

IVEP

-

SUPL

-

Consumer Cyclical

IVEP

-

SUPL

-

Consumer Defensive

IVEP

-

SUPL

-

Financial Services

IVEP

-

SUPL

-

Healthcare

IVEP

-

SUPL
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVEP vs. SUPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVEP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SUPL
SUPL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SUPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUPL Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SUPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUPL Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVEP vs. SUPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF (IVEP) and ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF (SUPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVEPSUPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.40

IVEP vs. SUPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVEP vs. SUPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVEP drawdown since its inception was -12.17%, smaller than the maximum SUPL drawdown of -24.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVEP and SUPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVEPSUPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.17%

-24.42%

+12.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.17%

0.00%

-12.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-5.86%

+1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

Volatility

IVEP vs. SUPL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVEPSUPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.12%

16.61%

+12.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.12%

18.94%

+10.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.12%

18.94%

+10.18%

IVEP vs. SUPL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVEP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SUPL's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVEP vs. SUPL - Dividend Comparison

IVEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SUPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IVEP
Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SUPL
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF
2.40%3.03%4.78%4.71%3.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVEP and SUPL have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SUPL is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SUPL is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVEP.

SUPL has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 0.00% for IVEP.

IVEP tracks Solactive Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure Index, while SUPL tracks FactSet Supply Chain Logistics Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Wedbush and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IVEP and 0.58% for SUPL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVEP and SUPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer