IUVF.L vs. PQVM.L
IUVF.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS) and PQVM.L (Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUVF.L is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while PQVM.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUVF.L returned 16.97%/yr vs 16.70%/yr for PQVM.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUVF.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PQVM.L.
Performance
IUVF.L vs. PQVM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUVF.L is traded in GBp, while PQVM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PQVM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUVF.L achieves a 46.62% return, which is significantly higher than PQVM.L's 17.12% return.
IUVF.L
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 16.86%
- YTD
- 46.62%
- 6M
- 49.54%
- 1Y
- 90.82%
- 3Y*
- 29.97%
- 5Y*
- 16.97%
- 10Y*
- —
PQVM.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 5.31%
- YTD
- 17.12%
- 6M
- 16.98%
- 1Y
- 23.95%
- 3Y*
- 21.25%
- 5Y*
- 16.70%
- 10Y*
- —
IUVF.L vs. PQVM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUVF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS | 46.62% | 23.92% | 8.23% | 8.28% | -4.63% | 31.29% | -5.36% | 22.90% | -7.17% | 13.45% |
PQVM.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 17.12% | 5.56% | 32.44% | 1.48% | 12.47% | 27.32% | 4.88% | 20.31% | -1.48% | 13.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUVF.L and PQVM.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017 | 0.73 |
The correlation between IUVF.L and PQVM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUVF.L vs. PQVM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUVF.L
PQVM.L
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
IUVF.L
PQVM.L
Financial Services
IUVF.L
PQVM.L
Healthcare
IUVF.L
PQVM.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUVF.L
PQVM.L
Communication Services
IUVF.L
PQVM.L
Industrials
IUVF.L
PQVM.L
Consumer Defensive
IUVF.L
PQVM.L
Energy
IUVF.L
PQVM.L
Utilities
IUVF.L
PQVM.L
Real Estate
IUVF.L
PQVM.L
-
Basic Materials
IUVF.L
PQVM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUVF.L vs. PQVM.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUVF.L
PQVM.L
IUVF.L vs. PQVM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS (IUVF.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUVF.L | PQVM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.05 | 1.37 | +0.68 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.82 | 5.17 | +10.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 61.43 | 16.89 | +44.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUVF.L | PQVM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.93 | 2.08 | +3.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 1.06 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.85 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
IUVF.L vs. PQVM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUVF.L drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, which is greater than PQVM.L's maximum drawdown of -26.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUVF.L and PQVM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUVF.L | PQVM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.83% | -26.48% | -5.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.71% | -4.61% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -17.12% | -3.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.13% | -17.12% | -3.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | 0.00% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.67% | -4.22% | -1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 1.41% | +0.06% |
Volatility
IUVF.L vs. PQVM.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS (IUVF.L) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L) at 3.57%. This indicates that IUVF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PQVM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUVF.L | PQVM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.56% | 3.57% | +2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.10% | 9.05% | +3.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.24% | 11.47% | +3.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 15.83% | +0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.43% | 17.14% | +1.29% |
IUVF.L vs. PQVM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUVF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PQVM.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUVF.L vs. PQVM.L - Dividend Comparison
IUVF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQVM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUVF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PQVM.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 0.77% | 0.82% | 0.84% | 1.58% | 1.79% | 0.89% | 1.48% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUVF.L and PQVM.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUVF.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUVF.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVM.L.
IUVF.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while PQVM.L is S&P 500. IUVF.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while PQVM.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUVF.L and 0.35% for PQVM.L.
Find the right allocation for IUVF.L and PQVM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer