PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUVF.L vs. IUAA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUVF.L vs. IUAA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS (IUVF.L) and iShares US Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUAA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUVF.L is traded in GBp, while IUAA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUAA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUVF.L achieves a 46.62% return, which is significantly higher than IUAA.L's 0.30% return.


IUVF.L

1D
-0.97%
1M
16.86%
YTD
46.62%
6M
49.54%
1Y
90.82%
3Y*
29.97%
5Y*
16.97%
10Y*

IUAA.L

1D
0.33%
1M
1.04%
YTD
0.30%
6M
-0.21%
1Y
5.68%
3Y*
1.13%
5Y*
1.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUVF.L vs. IUAA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUVF.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS
46.62%23.92%8.23%8.28%-4.63%31.29%-5.36%22.90%-7.17%9.79%
IUAA.L
iShares US Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.30%-0.37%3.05%-0.37%-2.45%-1.09%3.94%4.57%5.52%-5.94%

Correlation

The correlation between IUVF.L and IUAA.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2017

0.11

The correlation between IUVF.L and IUAA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (5 years) to 0.24 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUVF.L vs. IUAA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUVF.L
IUVF.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IUVF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUVF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUVF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IUVF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUVF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

IUAA.L
IUAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
IUAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
IUAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUVF.L vs. IUAA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS (IUVF.L) and iShares US Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUAA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUVF.LIUAA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.05

1.15

+0.89

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

15.82

1.06

+14.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

61.43

2.71

+58.72

IUVF.L vs. IUAA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUVF.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.93, which is higher than the IUAA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUVF.L and IUAA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUVF.LIUAA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.93

0.85

+5.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.06

0.12

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.08

+0.75

Drawdowns

IUVF.L vs. IUAA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUVF.L drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, which is greater than IUAA.L's maximum drawdown of -17.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUVF.L and IUAA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUVF.LIUAA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.83%

-17.63%

-14.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.71%

-5.32%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-9.07%

-11.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.13%

-15.42%

-4.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-10.16%

+9.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.67%

-8.87%

+3.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

2.09%

-0.62%

Volatility

IUVF.L vs. IUAA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS (IUVF.L) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to iShares US Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUAA.L) at 1.98%. This indicates that IUVF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUAA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUVF.LIUAA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.56%

1.98%

+4.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.10%

5.37%

+6.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.24%

6.69%

+8.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.94%

8.88%

+7.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.43%

9.04%

+9.39%

IUVF.L vs. IUAA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUVF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IUAA.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUVF.L vs. IUAA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUVF.L nor IUAA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IUVF.L and IUAA.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUVF.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUVF.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IUAA.L.

IUVF.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IUAA.L is Total Bond Market. IUVF.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while IUAA.L tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUVF.L and 0.25% for IUAA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUVF.L and IUAA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer