PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUVD.L vs. SGLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUVD.L vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUVD.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUVD.L is traded in USD, while SGLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUVD.L achieves a 46.43% return, which is significantly higher than SGLN.L's 3.64% return.


IUVD.L

1D
-0.99%
1M
15.70%
YTD
46.43%
6M
50.36%
1Y
89.18%
3Y*
33.45%
5Y*
15.73%
10Y*

SGLN.L

1D
0.75%
1M
-2.20%
YTD
3.64%
6M
6.20%
1Y
32.48%
3Y*
31.47%
5Y*
18.86%
10Y*
13.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUVD.L vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IUVD.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
46.43%33.00%6.51%14.55%-14.85%29.63%-1.41%25.64%-11.85%
SGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
3.64%65.25%26.06%12.89%-0.12%-3.46%23.28%19.23%-3.87%

Correlation

The correlation between IUVD.L and SGLN.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2018

0.03

The correlation between IUVD.L and SGLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUVD.L vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUVD.L
IUVD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IUVD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUVD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUVD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
IUVD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUVD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

SGLN.L
SGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUVD.L vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUVD.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUVD.LSGLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.92

1.25

+0.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.77

1.85

+8.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

44.44

4.74

+39.70

IUVD.L vs. SGLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUVD.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.38, which is higher than the SGLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUVD.L and SGLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUVD.LSGLN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.38

1.33

+4.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

1.08

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.46

+0.22

Drawdowns

IUVD.L vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUVD.L drawdown since its inception was -39.67%, smaller than the maximum SGLN.L drawdown of -45.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUVD.L and SGLN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUVD.LSGLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.67%

-45.21%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.23%

-17.50%

+9.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.73%

-17.50%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.77%

-21.27%

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-15.90%

+14.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.12%

-19.80%

+11.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

6.83%

-4.83%

Volatility

IUVD.L vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUVD.L) has a higher volatility of 7.63% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) at 5.74%. This indicates that IUVD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUVD.LSGLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.63%

5.74%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.26%

21.04%

-7.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.48%

24.26%

-7.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.72%

17.52%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.84%

15.86%

+3.98%

IUVD.L vs. SGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUVD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SGLN.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUVD.L vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison

IUVD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while SGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IUVD.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.12%1.64%2.24%2.27%2.61%1.85%2.26%2.26%1.73%
SGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUVD.L and SGLN.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SGLN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUVD.L.

IUVD.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SGLN.L is Gold. IUVD.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUVD.L and 0.12% for SGLN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUVD.L and SGLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer