IUUS.L vs. SPMD.L
IUUS.L (iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and SPMD.L (iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both S&P 500 funds from iShares - IUUS.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Utilities while SPMD.L tracks the S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUUS.L returned 8.43%/yr vs 8.91%/yr for SPMD.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUUS.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SPMD.L.
Performance
IUUS.L vs. SPMD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUUS.L achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly lower than SPMD.L's 4.17% return.
IUUS.L
- 1D
- -2.15%
- 1M
- -6.94%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- -0.09%
- 1Y
- 8.47%
- 3Y*
- 12.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- —
SPMD.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- 4.17%
- 6M
- 5.47%
- 1Y
- 11.38%
- 3Y*
- 13.82%
- 5Y*
- 8.91%
- 10Y*
- —
IUUS.L vs. SPMD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUUS.L iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.37% | 15.80% | 22.91% | -8.06% | 2.07% | 18.39% | -1.11% | 24.68% | 8.82% |
SPMD.L iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.17% | 11.56% | 18.70% | 9.87% | -10.96% | 24.92% | 7.60% | 30.93% | -4.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUUS.L and SPMD.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2018 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IUUS.L and SPMD.L has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IUUS.L vs. SPMD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUUS.L
SPMD.L
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
IUUS.L
SPMD.L
Basic Materials
IUUS.L
-
SPMD.L
Communication Services
IUUS.L
-
SPMD.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUUS.L
-
SPMD.L
Consumer Defensive
IUUS.L
-
SPMD.L
Energy
IUUS.L
-
SPMD.L
Financial Services
IUUS.L
-
SPMD.L
Healthcare
IUUS.L
-
SPMD.L
Industrials
IUUS.L
-
SPMD.L
Real Estate
IUUS.L
-
SPMD.L
Technology
IUUS.L
-
SPMD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUUS.L vs. SPMD.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUUS.L
SPMD.L
IUUS.L vs. SPMD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUUS.L) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SPMD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUUS.L | SPMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.24 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 1.82 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.01 | 7.13 | -5.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUUS.L | SPMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 1.36 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.71 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.71 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
IUUS.L vs. SPMD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUUS.L drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, which is greater than SPMD.L's maximum drawdown of -33.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUUS.L and SPMD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUUS.L | SPMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -33.34% | -2.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.96% | -6.23% | -2.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.30% | -12.11% | -6.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.26% | -18.68% | -7.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.96% | 0.00% | -8.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.62% | -4.20% | -2.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 1.59% | +2.61% |
Volatility
IUUS.L vs. SPMD.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUUS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SPMD.L) at 2.06%. This indicates that IUUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUUS.L | SPMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.97% | 2.06% | +2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.62% | 5.98% | +5.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.27% | 8.35% | +5.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 12.56% | +4.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 14.63% | +3.74% |
IUUS.L vs. SPMD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUUS.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SPMD.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUUS.L vs. SPMD.L - Dividend Comparison
IUUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPMD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUUS.L iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMD.L iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.16% | 1.15% | 1.28% | 1.46% | 1.35% | 1.27% | 1.54% | 1.52% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IUUS.L and SPMD.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUUS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUUS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPMD.L.
IUUS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Utilities, while SPMD.L tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUUS.L and 0.20% for SPMD.L.
Find the right allocation for IUUS.L and SPMD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer