PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSU.L vs. XLUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSU.L vs. XLUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (IUSU.L) and Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUSU.L is traded in GBp, while XLUS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLUS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSU.L achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly lower than XLUS.L's 1.91% return.


IUSU.L

1D
-2.12%
1M
-5.89%
YTD
1.75%
6M
-0.56%
1Y
9.56%
3Y*
9.72%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*

XLUS.L

1D
-2.16%
1M
-6.07%
YTD
1.91%
6M
-0.77%
1Y
9.59%
3Y*
9.80%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
9.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSU.L vs. XLUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSU.L
iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF
1.75%7.65%25.08%-13.15%14.26%19.91%-4.85%21.27%9.03%-4.03%
XLUS.L
Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
1.91%7.44%24.64%-12.35%14.02%19.59%-4.27%20.49%9.01%-4.09%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSU.L and XLUS.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017

0.95

The correlation between IUSU.L and XLUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUSU.L vs. XLUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUSU.L
XLUS.L

Utilities

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

IUSU.L
100.0%
XLUS.L
100.0%

Basic Materials

IUSU.L

-

XLUS.L

-

Communication Services

IUSU.L

-

XLUS.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

IUSU.L

-

XLUS.L

-

Consumer Defensive

IUSU.L

-

XLUS.L

-

Energy

IUSU.L

-

XLUS.L

-

Financial Services

IUSU.L

-

XLUS.L

-

Healthcare

IUSU.L

-

XLUS.L

-

Industrials

IUSU.L

-

XLUS.L

-

Real Estate

IUSU.L

-

XLUS.L

-

Technology

IUSU.L

-

XLUS.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSU.L vs. XLUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSU.L
IUSU.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
IUSU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

XLUS.L
XLUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XLUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSU.L vs. XLUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (IUSU.L) and Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUSU.LXLUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.11

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

0.99

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.13

2.15

-0.01

IUSU.L vs. XLUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is comparable to the XLUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSU.L and XLUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUSU.LXLUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

0.62

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.56

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.62

-0.21

Drawdowns

IUSU.L vs. XLUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSU.L drawdown since its inception was -29.89%, roughly equal to the maximum XLUS.L drawdown of -29.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSU.L and XLUS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSU.LXLUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.89%

-29.81%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-9.63%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.82%

-13.82%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.89%

-29.81%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.06%

-8.82%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.80%

-7.77%

-1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.47%

4.46%

+0.01%

Volatility

IUSU.L vs. XLUS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (IUSU.L) is 5.31%, while Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that IUSU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSU.LXLUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

5.63%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.29%

12.75%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.75%

15.45%

-0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.69%

17.19%

-0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.28%

18.94%

-0.66%

IUSU.L vs. XLUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLUS.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUSU.L vs. XLUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUSU.L nor XLUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, IUSU.L and XLUS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XLUS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLUS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUSU.L.

IUSU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Utilities, while XLUS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Utilities Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IUSU.L and 0.14% for XLUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSU.L and XLUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer