PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUST.DE vs. XTIP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUST.DE vs. XTIP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares USD TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUST.DE) and Xtrackers II TIPS US Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XTIP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUST.DE achieves a 2.52% return, which is significantly lower than XTIP.DE's 2.69% return.


IUST.DE

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.63%
YTD
2.52%
6M
1.56%
1Y
2.97%
3Y*
1.05%
5Y*
1.90%
10Y*
2.38%

XTIP.DE

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.81%
YTD
2.69%
6M
1.65%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
1.04%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUST.DE vs. XTIP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IUST.DE
iShares USD TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
2.52%-4.87%7.83%-0.00%-6.47%
XTIP.DE
Xtrackers II TIPS US Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 1C
2.69%-5.01%7.81%0.02%-6.46%

Correlation

The correlation between IUST.DE and XTIP.DE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2022

0.99

The correlation between IUST.DE and XTIP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUST.DE vs. XTIP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUST.DE
IUST.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
IUST.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUST.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUST.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
IUST.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUST.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

XTIP.DE
XTIP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XTIP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTIP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTIP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XTIP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTIP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUST.DE vs. XTIP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUST.DE) and Xtrackers II TIPS US Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XTIP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUST.DEXTIP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.09

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

0.74

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.93

1.83

+0.10

IUST.DE vs. XTIP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUST.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is comparable to the XTIP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUST.DE and XTIP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUST.DEXTIP.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

0.47

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

-0.06

+0.49

Drawdowns

IUST.DE vs. XTIP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUST.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.93%, which is greater than XTIP.DE's maximum drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUST.DE and XTIP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUST.DEXTIP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.93%

-10.79%

-9.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.00%

-3.81%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.75%

-10.79%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.09%

-5.92%

-2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.85%

-5.84%

-1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

1.54%

0.00%

Volatility

IUST.DE vs. XTIP.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUST.DE) is 0.74%, while Xtrackers II TIPS US Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XTIP.DE) has a volatility of 1.05%. This indicates that IUST.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XTIP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUST.DEXTIP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

1.05%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.05%

4.07%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.92%

6.00%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.29%

7.60%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.00%

7.60%

+0.40%

IUST.DE vs. XTIP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUST.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than XTIP.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUST.DE vs. XTIP.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUST.DE nor XTIP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, IUST.DE and XTIP.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XTIP.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XTIP.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IUST.DE.

IUST.DE tracks Bloomberg US Government Inflation-Linked Bond, while XTIP.DE tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IUST.DE and 0.07% for XTIP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUST.DE and XTIP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer