IUSQ.DE vs. XDW0.DE
IUSQ.DE (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XDW0.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - IUSQ.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Index, while XDW0.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUSQ.DE returned 12.06%/yr vs 8.15%/yr for XDW0.DE. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUSQ.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDW0.DE.
Performance
IUSQ.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSQ.DE achieves a 14.11% return, which is significantly lower than XDW0.DE's 28.70% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSQ.DE has outperformed XDW0.DE with an annualized return of 12.06%, while XDW0.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.15% annualized return.
IUSQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 11.61%
- YTD
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- 25.48%
- 3Y*
- 18.33%
- 5Y*
- 11.84%
- 10Y*
- 12.06%
XDW0.DE
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 19.90%
- YTD
- 28.70%
- 1Y
- 34.95%
- 3Y*
- 15.05%
- 5Y*
- 20.85%
- 10Y*
- 8.15%
IUSQ.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSQ.DE iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 14.11% | 9.02% | 24.53% | 18.57% | -13.58% | 29.13% | 4.94% | 30.14% | -5.97% | 9.14% |
XDW0.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 28.70% | 2.24% | 7.48% | 0.19% | 53.95% | 52.21% | -36.99% | 14.05% | -12.13% | -7.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSQ.DE and XDW0.DE is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011 | 0.56 |
The correlation between IUSQ.DE and XDW0.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSQ.DE vs. XDW0.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IUSQ.DE
XDW0.DE
IUSQ.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUSQ.DE | XDW0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.28 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.91 | 2.24 | +1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.96 | 5.78 | +10.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUSQ.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.60%, smaller than the maximum XDW0.DE drawdown of -66.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSQ.DE and XDW0.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSQ.DE | XDW0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.60% | -66.27% | +32.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.48% | -15.55% | +9.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.25% | -23.70% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.25% | -23.70% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.60% | -61.44% | +27.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -10.20% | +9.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -22.94% | +18.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 6.03% | -4.44% |
Volatility
IUSQ.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) is 2.92%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that IUSQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDW0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSQ.DE | XDW0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 6.81% | -3.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.67% | 19.48% | -10.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.81% | 22.56% | -10.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.99% | 24.24% | -10.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.98% | 26.60% | -11.62% |
IUSQ.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSQ.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDW0.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUSQ.DE vs. XDW0.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUSQ.DE nor XDW0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUSQ.DE and XDW0.DE have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUSQ.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUSQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDW0.DE.
IUSQ.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while XDW0.DE is Energy Equities. IUSQ.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Index, while XDW0.DE tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUSQ.DE and 0.25% for XDW0.DE.
Find the right allocation for IUSQ.DE and XDW0.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer