PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSQ.DE vs. XDEV.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSQ.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSQ.DE achieves a 12.65% return, which is significantly lower than XDEV.DE's 35.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IUSQ.DE having a 12.38% annualized return and XDEV.DE not far behind at 12.35%.


IUSQ.DE

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.68%
YTD
12.65%
6M
12.87%
1Y
26.39%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
12.38%

XDEV.DE

1D
-0.89%
1M
11.02%
YTD
35.07%
6M
38.05%
1Y
63.16%
3Y*
26.76%
5Y*
17.35%
10Y*
12.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSQ.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSQ.DE
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)
12.65%9.02%24.53%18.57%-13.58%29.13%4.94%30.14%-5.97%9.14%
XDEV.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C
35.07%24.76%11.62%15.67%-4.96%30.90%-12.53%22.09%-10.42%7.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSQ.DE and XDEV.DE is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2014

0.86

The correlation between IUSQ.DE and XDEV.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSQ.DE vs. XDEV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSQ.DE
IUSQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IUSQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEV.DE
XDEV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
XDEV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSQ.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUSQ.DEXDEV.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.81

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

10.38

-6.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.69

39.12

-22.43

IUSQ.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is lower than the XDEV.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSQ.DE and XDEV.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUSQ.DEXDEV.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

4.52

-2.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

1.23

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.78

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.71

+0.05

Drawdowns

IUSQ.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.60%, roughly equal to the maximum XDEV.DE drawdown of -35.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSQ.DE and XDEV.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSQ.DEXDEV.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.60%

-35.28%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.48%

-6.05%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.25%

-18.02%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.25%

-18.02%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.60%

-35.28%

+1.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-1.07%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-5.56%

+1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.61%

-0.02%

Volatility

IUSQ.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) is 3.03%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.DE) has a volatility of 5.77%. This indicates that IUSQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSQ.DEXDEV.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

5.77%

-2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.26%

11.20%

-2.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.47%

13.89%

-2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.94%

13.96%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

15.90%

-0.88%

IUSQ.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSQ.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEV.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUSQ.DE vs. XDEV.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUSQ.DE nor XDEV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IUSQ.DE and XDEV.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUSQ.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUSQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEV.DE.

IUSQ.DE tracks MSCI All Country World (ACWI), while XDEV.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUSQ.DE and 0.25% for XDEV.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSQ.DE and XDEV.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer