IUSQ.DE vs. PPFB.DE
IUSQ.DE (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)) and PPFB.DE (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - IUSQ.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World (ACWI), while PPFB.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IUSQ.DE returned 17.12%/yr vs 28.05%/yr for PPFB.DE. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IUSQ.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for PPFB.DE.
Performance
IUSQ.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSQ.DE achieves a 11.73% return, which is significantly higher than PPFB.DE's 2.74% return.
IUSQ.DE
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 2.20%
- YTD
- 11.73%
- 6M
- 13.44%
- 1Y
- 25.86%
- 3Y*
- 17.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.02%
- 10Y*
- 12.55%
PPFB.DE
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -4.00%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 5.47%
- 1Y
- 31.35%
- 3Y*
- 28.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUSQ.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSQ.DE iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 11.73% | 9.02% | 24.53% | 18.57% | -13.58% | 9.79% |
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | 2.74% | 49.11% | 34.17% | 9.42% | 7.03% | 2.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSQ.DE and PPFB.DE is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021 | 0.08 |
The correlation between IUSQ.DE and PPFB.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSQ.DE vs. PPFB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IUSQ.DE
PPFB.DE
IUSQ.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUSQ.DE | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.26 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 1.81 | +2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.29 | 4.60 | +11.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUSQ.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.60%, which is greater than PPFB.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSQ.DE and PPFB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSQ.DE | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.60% | -16.60% | -17.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.48% | -16.60% | +10.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.25% | -16.60% | -4.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -15.00% | +13.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.18% | -4.42% | +0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | 6.55% | -4.97% |
Volatility
IUSQ.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) is 3.41%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that IUSQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPFB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSQ.DE | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | 5.11% | -1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.53% | 20.18% | -11.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.69% | 23.12% | -11.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 16.13% | -2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 16.13% | -1.10% |
IUSQ.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSQ.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than PPFB.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUSQ.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUSQ.DE nor PPFB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUSQ.DE and PPFB.DE have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PPFB.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PPFB.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUSQ.DE.
IUSQ.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while PPFB.DE is Precious Metals. IUSQ.DE tracks MSCI All Country World (ACWI), while PPFB.DE tracks Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUSQ.DE and 0.12% for PPFB.DE.
Find the right allocation for IUSQ.DE and PPFB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer