PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSQ.DE vs. IS3M.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSQ.DE vs. IS3M.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) and iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (IS3M.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSQ.DE achieves a 12.95% return, which is significantly higher than IS3M.DE's 1.00% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSQ.DE has outperformed IS3M.DE with an annualized return of 12.83%, while IS3M.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 1.03% annualized return.


IUSQ.DE

1D
-0.36%
1M
1.02%
YTD
12.95%
6M
13.38%
1Y
27.30%
3Y*
18.41%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*
12.83%

IS3M.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.19%
YTD
1.00%
6M
0.96%
1Y
2.16%
3Y*
3.30%
5Y*
2.11%
10Y*
1.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSQ.DE vs. IS3M.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSQ.DE
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)
12.95%9.02%24.53%18.57%-13.58%29.13%4.94%30.14%-5.97%9.14%
IS3M.DE
iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
1.00%2.60%4.13%3.42%-0.29%-0.36%0.09%0.34%-0.62%-0.09%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSQ.DE and IS3M.DE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2013

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSQ.DE vs. IS3M.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSQ.DE
IUSQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IUSQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

IS3M.DE
IS3M.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IS3M.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3M.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3M.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3M.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3M.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSQ.DE vs. IS3M.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) and iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (IS3M.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUSQ.DEIS3M.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.59

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

7.25

-3.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.20

45.99

-28.79

IUSQ.DE vs. IS3M.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the IS3M.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSQ.DE and IS3M.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUSQ.DE vs. IS3M.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.60%, which is greater than IS3M.DE's maximum drawdown of -3.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSQ.DE and IS3M.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSQ.DEIS3M.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.60%

-3.80%

-29.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.48%

-0.30%

-6.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.25%

-0.47%

-20.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.25%

-1.18%

-20.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.60%

-3.80%

-29.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

0.00%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-0.28%

-3.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

0.05%

+1.53%

Volatility

IUSQ.DE vs. IS3M.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (IS3M.DE) at 0.34%. This indicates that IUSQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS3M.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSQ.DEIS3M.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

0.34%

+3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.52%

0.63%

+7.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.71%

0.77%

+10.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.98%

0.77%

+13.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.01%

1.11%

+13.90%

IUSQ.DE vs. IS3M.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSQ.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IS3M.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUSQ.DE vs. IS3M.DE - Dividend Comparison

IUSQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IS3M.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IS3M.DE
iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
2.33%2.74%3.80%2.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.13%
IUSQ.DE
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUSQ.DE and IS3M.DE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IS3M.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IS3M.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUSQ.DE.

IUSQ.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while IS3M.DE is Ultrashort Bond. IUSQ.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Index, while IS3M.DE tracks Markit iBoxx EUR Liquid Investment Grade Ultrashort Index (EUR). Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUSQ.DE and 0.09% for IS3M.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSQ.DE and IS3M.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer