PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSP.DE vs. CSSPX.MI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSP.DE vs. CSSPX.MI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF (IUSP.DE) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSSPX.MI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSP.DE achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than CSSPX.MI's 11.35% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSP.DE has underperformed CSSPX.MI with an annualized return of 2.78%, while CSSPX.MI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.96% annualized return.


IUSP.DE

1D
-0.57%
1M
1.60%
YTD
-0.08%
6M
-0.09%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
4.80%
5Y*
2.97%
10Y*
2.78%

CSSPX.MI

1D
-0.13%
1M
5.24%
YTD
11.35%
6M
11.43%
1Y
25.64%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
14.77%
10Y*
14.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSP.DE vs. CSSPX.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSP.DE
iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF
-0.08%6.45%4.79%9.50%-3.59%-2.39%-6.15%15.54%-1.76%0.77%
CSSPX.MI
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.35%4.27%33.76%22.03%-14.58%40.89%7.57%34.27%-1.05%6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSP.DE and CSSPX.MI is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2011

0.45

The correlation between IUSP.DE and CSSPX.MI shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (5 years) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSP.DE vs. CSSPX.MI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSP.DE
IUSP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
IUSP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

CSSPX.MI
CSSPX.MI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CSSPX.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSSPX.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSSPX.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
CSSPX.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSSPX.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSP.DE vs. CSSPX.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF (IUSP.DE) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSSPX.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUSP.DECSSPX.MIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.41

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

3.59

-2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.19

12.78

-9.59

IUSP.DE vs. CSSPX.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the CSSPX.MI Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSP.DE and CSSPX.MI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUSP.DECSSPX.MIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

2.24

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.96

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.92

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.93

-0.80

Drawdowns

IUSP.DE vs. CSSPX.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSP.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.42%, smaller than the maximum CSSPX.MI drawdown of -33.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSP.DE and CSSPX.MI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSP.DECSSPX.MIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.42%

-33.56%

+7.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.53%

-7.14%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.04%

-23.26%

+16.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.18%

-23.26%

+14.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.74%

-33.56%

+13.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-0.41%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-4.10%

-5.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

2.01%

-0.36%

Volatility

IUSP.DE vs. CSSPX.MI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF (IUSP.DE) is 1.71%, while iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSSPX.MI) has a volatility of 2.65%. This indicates that IUSP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSSPX.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSP.DECSSPX.MIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.71%

2.65%

-0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.42%

7.54%

-2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.06%

11.46%

-5.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.33%

15.18%

-7.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.56%

16.08%

-7.52%

IUSP.DE vs. CSSPX.MI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSP.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CSSPX.MI's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUSP.DE vs. CSSPX.MI - Dividend Comparison

IUSP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.43%, while CSSPX.MI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSSPX.MI
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IUSP.DE
iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF
5.43%7.21%7.03%6.58%7.55%5.13%6.21%6.11%6.67%6.42%6.34%4.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUSP.DE and CSSPX.MI have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSSPX.MI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSSPX.MI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IUSP.DE.

IUSP.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while CSSPX.MI is S&P 500. IUSP.DE tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD, while CSSPX.MI tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IUSP.DE and 0.07% for CSSPX.MI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSP.DE and CSSPX.MI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer