PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSP.DE vs. CEB0.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSP.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF (IUSP.DE) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (CEB0.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSP.DE achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than CEB0.DE's 1.63% return.


IUSP.DE

1D
-0.57%
1M
1.60%
YTD
-0.08%
6M
-0.09%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
4.80%
5Y*
2.97%
10Y*
2.78%

CEB0.DE

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.79%
1Y
1.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSP.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IUSP.DE
iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF
-0.08%6.45%4.57%
CEB0.DE
iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist
1.63%0.43%6.89%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSP.DE and CEB0.DE is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2024

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSP.DE vs. CEB0.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSP.DE
IUSP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
IUSP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

CEB0.DE
CEB0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
CEB0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEB0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEB0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
CEB0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEB0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSP.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF (IUSP.DE) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (CEB0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUSP.DECEB0.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.18

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

1.43

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.19

3.02

+0.17

IUSP.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the CEB0.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSP.DE and CEB0.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUSP.DECEB0.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

0.94

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

2.03

-1.90

Drawdowns

IUSP.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSP.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.42%, which is greater than CEB0.DE's maximum drawdown of -1.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSP.DE and CEB0.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSP.DECEB0.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.42%

-1.83%

-24.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.53%

-1.11%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-0.34%

-1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-0.38%

-9.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

0.52%

+1.13%

Volatility

IUSP.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF (IUSP.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.71% compared to iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (CEB0.DE) at 1.02%. This indicates that IUSP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEB0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSP.DECEB0.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.71%

1.02%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.42%

1.45%

+3.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.06%

1.68%

+4.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.33%

2.03%

+5.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.56%

2.03%

+6.53%

IUSP.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IUSP.DE and CEB0.DE have an expense ratio of 0.40%.


Dividends

IUSP.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Dividend Comparison

IUSP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.43%, more than CEB0.DE's 1.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEB0.DE
iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist
1.81%1.84%1.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IUSP.DE
iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF
5.43%7.21%7.03%6.58%7.55%5.13%6.21%6.11%6.67%6.42%6.34%4.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUSP.DE and CEB0.DE have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUSP.DE and CEB0.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

IUSP.DE tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD, while CEB0.DE tracks Bloomberg Barclays China Treasury + Policy Bank Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSP.DE and CEB0.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer