PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSE.L vs. XDWU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSE.L vs. XDWU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Acc (IUSE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUSE.L is traded in EUR, while XDWU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XDWU.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSE.L achieves a 8.85% return, which is significantly lower than XDWU.L's 12.08% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSE.L has outperformed XDWU.L with an annualized return of 12.18%, while XDWU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.30% annualized return.


IUSE.L

1D
0.14%
1M
-0.08%
6M
8.61%
YTD
8.85%
1Y
18.98%
3Y*
17.50%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
12.18%

XDWU.L

1D
-0.77%
1M
3.44%
6M
10.18%
YTD
12.08%
1Y
20.41%
3Y*
14.63%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
8.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSE.L vs. XDWU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSE.L
iShares S&P 500 EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Acc
8.85%14.95%23.21%23.05%-21.17%27.85%14.81%26.33%-8.40%19.04%
XDWU.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C
12.08%10.47%20.71%-2.69%2.41%18.83%-4.24%25.10%7.29%-0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSE.L and XDWU.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2010

0.38

Over the past year, the correlation between IUSE.L and XDWU.L has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IUSE.L vs. XDWU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUSE.L
XDWU.L

Technology

39.1%

-

Financial Services

11.1%

-

Communication Services

10.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
0.5%

Healthcare

8.3%

-

Industrials

7.8%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%

-

Energy

3.1%
0.5%

Utilities

2.1%
97.3%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Technology

IUSE.L
39.1%
XDWU.L

-

Financial Services

IUSE.L
11.1%
XDWU.L

-

Communication Services

IUSE.L
10.6%
XDWU.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

IUSE.L
9.9%
XDWU.L
0.5%

Healthcare

IUSE.L
8.3%
XDWU.L

-

Industrials

IUSE.L
7.8%
XDWU.L
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

IUSE.L
4.5%
XDWU.L

-

Energy

IUSE.L
3.1%
XDWU.L
0.5%

Utilities

IUSE.L
2.1%
XDWU.L
97.3%

Real Estate

IUSE.L
1.8%
XDWU.L

-

Basic Materials

IUSE.L
1.7%
XDWU.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSE.L vs. XDWU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSE.L
IUSE.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IUSE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWU.L
XDWU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XDWU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSE.L vs. XDWU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Acc (IUSE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUSE.LXDWU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

2.70

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.77

7.07

+1.70

IUSE.L vs. XDWU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the XDWU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSE.L and XDWU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUSE.L vs. XDWU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSE.L drawdown since its inception was -34.75%, roughly equal to the maximum XDWU.L drawdown of -33.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSE.L and XDWU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSE.LXDWU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.75%

-33.47%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.67%

-7.53%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.33%

-12.65%

-5.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.23%

-23.34%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.75%

-33.47%

-1.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-1.69%

+0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.25%

-6.24%

+1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

2.88%

-0.72%

Volatility

IUSE.L vs. XDWU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Acc (IUSE.L) is 2.80%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that IUSE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSE.LXDWU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

3.93%

-1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.28%

10.97%

-1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.04%

13.13%

-1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.07%

14.63%

+1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.28%

15.62%

+0.66%

IUSE.L vs. XDWU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSE.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWU.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUSE.L vs. XDWU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUSE.L nor XDWU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IUSE.L and XDWU.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUSE.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUSE.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWU.L.

IUSE.L is categorized as S&P 500, while XDWU.L is Utilities Equities. IUSE.L tracks S&P 500 EUR Hedged Index, while XDWU.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUSE.L and 0.25% for XDWU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSE.L and XDWU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer