IUSE.L vs. BYBG.L
IUSE.L (iShares S&P 500 EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Acc) and BYBG.L (Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD) are both S&P 500 funds - IUSE.L tracks the S&P 500 EUR Hedged Index while BYBG.L tracks the S&P 500 Buyback NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUSE.L returned 12.48%/yr vs 12.81%/yr for BYBG.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUSE.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BYBG.L.
Performance
IUSE.L vs. BYBG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUSE.L is traded in EUR, while BYBG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BYBG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IUSE.L having a 9.10% return and BYBG.L slightly higher at 9.42%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IUSE.L having a 12.48% annualized return and BYBG.L not far ahead at 12.81%.
IUSE.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 9.10%
- 6M
- 9.36%
- 1Y
- 24.30%
- 3Y*
- 19.47%
- 5Y*
- 11.10%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
BYBG.L
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 5.50%
- YTD
- 9.42%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 20.59%
- 3Y*
- 15.39%
- 5Y*
- 11.19%
- 10Y*
- 12.81%
IUSE.L vs. BYBG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSE.L iShares S&P 500 EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Acc | 9.10% | 14.95% | 23.20% | 23.05% | -21.17% | 27.85% | 14.81% | 26.33% | -8.40% | 19.04% |
BYBG.L Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD | 9.44% | 3.70% | 21.42% | 11.90% | -6.38% | 44.80% | -3.55% | 34.82% | -4.95% | 5.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSE.L and BYBG.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2015 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IUSE.L and BYBG.L has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IUSE.L vs. BYBG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUSE.L
BYBG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
IUSE.L
BYBG.L
Financial Services
IUSE.L
BYBG.L
Communication Services
IUSE.L
BYBG.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUSE.L
BYBG.L
Healthcare
IUSE.L
BYBG.L
Industrials
IUSE.L
BYBG.L
Consumer Defensive
IUSE.L
BYBG.L
Energy
IUSE.L
BYBG.L
Utilities
IUSE.L
BYBG.L
Real Estate
IUSE.L
BYBG.L
-
Basic Materials
IUSE.L
BYBG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSE.L vs. BYBG.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUSE.L
BYBG.L
IUSE.L vs. BYBG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Acc (IUSE.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUSE.L | BYBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.31 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 4.42 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.09 | 11.29 | +0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUSE.L | BYBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 1.76 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.70 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.68 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.56 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
IUSE.L vs. BYBG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSE.L drawdown since its inception was -34.75%, smaller than the maximum BYBG.L drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSE.L and BYBG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSE.L | BYBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.75% | -41.97% | +7.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.67% | -4.64% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.33% | -22.52% | +4.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.23% | -22.52% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.75% | -41.97% | +7.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | 0.00% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.31% | -5.81% | +1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 1.82% | +0.21% |
Volatility
IUSE.L vs. BYBG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Acc (IUSE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.24% compared to Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBG.L) at 2.82%. This indicates that IUSE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BYBG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSE.L | BYBG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | 2.82% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.53% | 7.71% | +0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.58% | 11.66% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 15.91% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 18.87% | -2.54% |
IUSE.L vs. BYBG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSE.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BYBG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUSE.L vs. BYBG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUSE.L nor BYBG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUSE.L and BYBG.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BYBG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BYBG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUSE.L.
IUSE.L tracks S&P 500 EUR Hedged Index, while BYBG.L tracks S&P 500 Buyback NTR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUSE.L and 0.15% for BYBG.L.
Find the right allocation for IUSE.L and BYBG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer