PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSA.L vs. UC99.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSA.L vs. UC99.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist (IUSA.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IUSA.L having a 10.67% return and UC99.L slightly lower at 10.42%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IUSA.L having a 16.52% annualized return and UC99.L not far behind at 16.19%.


IUSA.L

1D
0.04%
1M
4.50%
YTD
10.67%
6M
10.05%
1Y
29.42%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
15.33%
10Y*
16.52%

UC99.L

1D
0.63%
1M
5.54%
YTD
10.42%
6M
10.00%
1Y
29.38%
3Y*
17.61%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
16.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSA.L vs. UC99.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSA.L
iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist
10.67%9.70%27.73%20.24%-8.72%31.54%14.15%27.06%0.51%11.19%
UC99.L
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
10.42%8.68%22.60%27.58%-15.03%28.64%16.43%32.55%0.49%12.84%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSA.L and UC99.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015

0.94

The correlation between IUSA.L and UC99.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUSA.L vs. UC99.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUSA.L
UC99.L

Technology

38.2%
54.7%

Financial Services

11.1%
7.3%

Communication Services

10.9%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
2.9%

Healthcare

8.3%
10.9%

Industrials

7.9%
13.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
2.8%

Energy

3.2%

-

Utilities

2.2%
0.1%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%
0.0%

Technology

IUSA.L
38.2%
UC99.L
54.7%

Financial Services

IUSA.L
11.1%
UC99.L
7.3%

Communication Services

IUSA.L
10.9%
UC99.L
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IUSA.L
10.0%
UC99.L
2.9%

Healthcare

IUSA.L
8.3%
UC99.L
10.9%

Industrials

IUSA.L
7.9%
UC99.L
13.3%

Consumer Defensive

IUSA.L
4.7%
UC99.L
2.8%

Energy

IUSA.L
3.2%
UC99.L

-

Utilities

IUSA.L
2.2%
UC99.L
0.1%

Real Estate

IUSA.L
1.9%
UC99.L

-

Basic Materials

IUSA.L
1.7%
UC99.L
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSA.L vs. UC99.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSA.L
IUSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IUSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

UC99.L
UC99.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UC99.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC99.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC99.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
UC99.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC99.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSA.L vs. UC99.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist (IUSA.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUSA.LUC99.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.43

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.20

3.10

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.53

11.14

+4.39

IUSA.L vs. UC99.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is comparable to the UC99.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSA.L and UC99.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUSA.LUC99.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

2.41

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

0.87

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.06

0.98

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

1.00

-0.41

Drawdowns

IUSA.L vs. UC99.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSA.L drawdown since its inception was -38.58%, which is greater than UC99.L's maximum drawdown of -23.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSA.L and UC99.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSA.LUC99.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.58%

-23.20%

-15.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-9.47%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.08%

-23.20%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.08%

-23.20%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.42%

-23.20%

-2.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

0.00%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.29%

-4.24%

-3.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.64%

-0.74%

Volatility

IUSA.L vs. UC99.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist (IUSA.L) is 2.62%, while UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that IUSA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC99.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSA.LUC99.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

3.33%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.13%

8.62%

-1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.44%

12.19%

-1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.33%

16.02%

-1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.60%

16.54%

-0.94%

IUSA.L vs. UC99.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than UC99.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUSA.L vs. UC99.L - Dividend Comparison

IUSA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, while UC99.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUSA.L
iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist
1.15%1.24%1.28%1.55%1.74%1.39%1.80%1.96%2.22%1.95%1.75%2.29%
UC99.L
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.00%0.00%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUSA.L and UC99.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUSA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUSA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UC99.L.

IUSA.L is categorized as S&P 500, while UC99.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. IUSA.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while UC99.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IUSA.L and 0.25% for UC99.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSA.L and UC99.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer