PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSA.DE vs. EUNN.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSA.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Dist (IUSA.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSA.DE achieves a 11.82% return, which is significantly lower than EUNN.DE's 15.08% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSA.DE has outperformed EUNN.DE with an annualized return of 14.31%, while EUNN.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.53% annualized return.


IUSA.DE

1D
-1.23%
1M
0.29%
6M
9.52%
YTD
11.82%
1Y
21.99%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
13.46%
10Y*
14.31%

EUNN.DE

1D
-2.52%
1M
-5.18%
6M
8.06%
YTD
15.08%
1Y
32.94%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
9.33%
10Y*
8.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSA.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSA.DE
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Dist
11.82%4.69%32.36%22.47%-14.25%40.75%6.77%34.55%-1.14%6.67%
EUNN.DE
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF
15.08%13.46%12.91%15.16%-11.48%9.24%4.12%22.22%-10.32%10.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSA.DE and EUNN.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2009

0.61

The correlation between IUSA.DE and EUNN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSA.DE vs. EUNN.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSA.DE
IUSA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IUSA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

EUNN.DE
EUNN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
EUNN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSA.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Dist (IUSA.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUSA.DEEUNN.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.31

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

3.27

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.06

10.78

+0.28

IUSA.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the EUNN.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSA.DE and EUNN.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUSA.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSA.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.05%, which is greater than EUNN.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSA.DE and EUNN.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSA.DEEUNN.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.05%

-28.56%

-23.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-9.58%

+2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.36%

-15.81%

-7.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.36%

-19.41%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.67%

-28.56%

-5.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-6.26%

+4.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.41%

-6.83%

-1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

2.91%

-0.97%

Volatility

IUSA.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Dist (IUSA.DE) is 3.00%, while iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that IUSA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUNN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSA.DEEUNN.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

6.29%

-3.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.88%

15.79%

-7.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.64%

19.09%

-7.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

16.28%

-1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.04%

16.14%

-0.10%

IUSA.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSA.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNN.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUSA.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Dividend Comparison

IUSA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, while EUNN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUNN.DE
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IUSA.DE
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Dist
0.86%0.94%0.99%1.25%1.46%0.99%1.40%1.48%1.70%1.51%1.37%1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUSA.DE and EUNN.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUSA.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUSA.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for EUNN.DE.

IUSA.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while EUNN.DE is Japan Equities. IUSA.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while EUNN.DE tracks MSCI Japan IMI. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IUSA.DE and 0.12% for EUNN.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSA.DE and EUNN.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer