PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSA.DE vs. AIGI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSA.DE vs. AIGI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Dist (IUSA.DE) and WisdomTree Industrial Metals (AIGI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUSA.DE is traded in EUR, while AIGI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AIGI.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSA.DE achieves a 11.82% return, which is significantly higher than AIGI.L's 10.04% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSA.DE has outperformed AIGI.L with an annualized return of 14.31%, while AIGI.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.29% annualized return.


IUSA.DE

1D
-1.23%
1M
0.29%
6M
9.52%
YTD
11.82%
1Y
21.99%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
13.46%
10Y*
14.31%

AIGI.L

1D
-1.26%
1M
-4.47%
6M
4.82%
YTD
10.04%
1Y
18.06%
3Y*
9.45%
5Y*
4.99%
10Y*
6.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSA.DE vs. AIGI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSA.DE
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Dist
11.82%4.69%32.36%22.47%-14.25%40.75%6.77%34.55%-1.14%6.67%
AIGI.L
WisdomTree Industrial Metals
10.04%5.27%9.85%-14.40%3.11%38.29%4.91%8.62%-15.60%10.97%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSA.DE and AIGI.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.31

The correlation between IUSA.DE and AIGI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (5 years) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSA.DE vs. AIGI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSA.DE
IUSA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IUSA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

AIGI.L
AIGI.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
AIGI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIGI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIGI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
AIGI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIGI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSA.DE vs. AIGI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Dist (IUSA.DE) and WisdomTree Industrial Metals (AIGI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUSA.DEAIGI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.18

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

1.59

+1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.06

3.41

+7.66

IUSA.DE vs. AIGI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the AIGI.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSA.DE and AIGI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUSA.DE vs. AIGI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSA.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.05%, smaller than the maximum AIGI.L drawdown of -60.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSA.DE and AIGI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSA.DEAIGI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.05%

-60.44%

+8.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-11.29%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.36%

-21.41%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.36%

-41.60%

+18.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.67%

-41.60%

+7.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-22.08%

+20.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.41%

-33.49%

+25.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

5.29%

-3.35%

Volatility

IUSA.DE vs. AIGI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Dist (IUSA.DE) is 3.00%, while WisdomTree Industrial Metals (AIGI.L) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that IUSA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIGI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSA.DEAIGI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

6.18%

-3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.88%

13.36%

-5.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.64%

20.00%

-8.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

21.49%

-6.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.04%

19.19%

-3.15%

IUSA.DE vs. AIGI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSA.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than AIGI.L's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUSA.DE vs. AIGI.L - Dividend Comparison

IUSA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, while AIGI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIGI.L
WisdomTree Industrial Metals
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IUSA.DE
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Dist
0.86%0.94%0.99%1.25%1.46%0.99%1.40%1.48%1.70%1.51%1.37%1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUSA.DE and AIGI.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUSA.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUSA.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AIGI.L.

IUSA.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while AIGI.L is Metals. IUSA.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while AIGI.L tracks Bloomberg Industrial Metals. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IUSA.DE and 0.49% for AIGI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSA.DE and AIGI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer