PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUS7.DE vs. LYQS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUS7.DE vs. LYQS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IUS7.DE) and Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (LYQS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IUS7.DE having a 4.85% return and LYQS.DE slightly lower at 4.68%. Over the past 10 years, IUS7.DE has outperformed LYQS.DE with an annualized return of 2.59%, while LYQS.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 1.35% annualized return.


IUS7.DE

1D
0.16%
1M
0.76%
6M
4.15%
YTD
4.85%
1Y
11.77%
3Y*
8.16%
5Y*
2.45%
10Y*
2.59%

LYQS.DE

1D
0.06%
1M
0.64%
6M
4.04%
YTD
4.68%
1Y
11.26%
3Y*
6.19%
5Y*
1.45%
10Y*
1.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUS7.DE vs. LYQS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUS7.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.85%1.15%11.75%6.76%-13.15%5.75%-4.03%18.80%-1.17%-3.38%
LYQS.DE
Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.68%0.04%6.43%5.45%-11.25%5.76%-5.23%17.03%-0.39%-4.62%

Correlation

The correlation between IUS7.DE and LYQS.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2010

0.85

The correlation between IUS7.DE and LYQS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUS7.DE vs. LYQS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUS7.DE
IUS7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
IUS7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUS7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUS7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IUS7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUS7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

LYQS.DE
LYQS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
LYQS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYQS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYQS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
LYQS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYQS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUS7.DE vs. LYQS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IUS7.DE) and Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (LYQS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUS7.DELYQS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.36

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

4.01

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.14

12.39

-1.25

IUS7.DE vs. LYQS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUS7.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the LYQS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUS7.DE and LYQS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUS7.DE vs. LYQS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUS7.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.13%, smaller than the maximum LYQS.DE drawdown of -33.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUS7.DE and LYQS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUS7.DELYQS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.13%

-33.51%

+6.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.09%

-2.80%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.95%

-12.78%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.91%

-16.18%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.13%

-25.61%

-1.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-1.53%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.39%

-12.90%

+6.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.91%

+0.14%

Volatility

IUS7.DE vs. LYQS.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IUS7.DE) and Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (LYQS.DE) have volatilities of 1.55% and 1.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUS7.DELYQS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

1.49%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.23%

4.00%

+0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.19%

5.95%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.56%

9.62%

-1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.00%

17.02%

-6.02%

IUS7.DE vs. LYQS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUS7.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LYQS.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUS7.DE vs. LYQS.DE - Dividend Comparison

IUS7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, more than LYQS.DE's 5.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUS7.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
5.65%6.10%5.62%5.77%5.63%3.81%4.18%4.73%4.70%5.11%5.30%4.71%
LYQS.DE
Amundi USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
5.12%5.36%3.57%6.06%6.00%4.33%4.48%5.10%5.08%5.40%5.15%6.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, IUS7.DE and LYQS.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, LYQS.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYQS.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for IUS7.DE.

IUS7.DE tracks JP Morgan EMBI Global Core, while LYQS.DE tracks J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for IUS7.DE and 0.25% for LYQS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUS7.DE and LYQS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer