PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUS3.DE vs. ETLZ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUS3.DE vs. ETLZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUS3.DE) and L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (ETLZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IUS3.DE having a 21.73% return and ETLZ.DE slightly lower at 21.58%. Over the past 10 years, IUS3.DE has underperformed ETLZ.DE with an annualized return of 9.75%, while ETLZ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.70% annualized return.


IUS3.DE

1D
-1.40%
1M
2.86%
6M
14.84%
YTD
21.73%
1Y
31.42%
3Y*
12.48%
5Y*
7.86%
10Y*
9.75%

ETLZ.DE

1D
-1.18%
1M
2.00%
6M
13.39%
YTD
21.58%
1Y
33.22%
3Y*
14.56%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
10.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUS3.DE vs. ETLZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUS3.DE
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
21.73%-4.35%12.84%13.50%-12.46%38.71%0.11%25.84%-6.51%-0.88%
ETLZ.DE
L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc
21.58%0.32%15.12%16.03%-14.22%30.61%8.11%28.84%-9.27%0.58%

Correlation

The correlation between IUS3.DE and ETLZ.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2008

0.91

The correlation between IUS3.DE and ETLZ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUS3.DE vs. ETLZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUS3.DE
IUS3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IUS3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUS3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUS3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
IUS3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUS3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

ETLZ.DE
ETLZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ETLZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETLZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETLZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ETLZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETLZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUS3.DE vs. ETLZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUS3.DE) and L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (ETLZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUS3.DEETLZ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.35

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.98

4.69

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.69

14.08

+0.61

IUS3.DE vs. ETLZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUS3.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the ETLZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUS3.DE and ETLZ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUS3.DE vs. ETLZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUS3.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.43%, roughly equal to the maximum ETLZ.DE drawdown of -58.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUS3.DE and ETLZ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUS3.DEETLZ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.43%

-58.36%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.28%

-7.04%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.89%

-31.34%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.89%

-31.34%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.55%

-41.01%

-0.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.89%

-2.09%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.68%

-10.70%

-1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

2.35%

-0.22%

Volatility

IUS3.DE vs. ETLZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUS3.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (ETLZ.DE) at 4.38%. This indicates that IUS3.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETLZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUS3.DEETLZ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

4.38%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.91%

11.12%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.34%

16.39%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.07%

19.97%

+0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.40%

21.00%

+0.40%

IUS3.DE vs. ETLZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUS3.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ETLZ.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUS3.DE vs. ETLZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

IUS3.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while ETLZ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETLZ.DE
L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IUS3.DE
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.52%1.24%1.13%1.08%1.05%0.62%0.96%0.92%0.98%0.79%0.84%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, IUS3.DE and ETLZ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ETLZ.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ETLZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IUS3.DE.

IUS3.DE tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while ETLZ.DE tracks Russell 2000 0.4 Quality Target Exposure Factor Net Tax Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IUS3.DE and 0.30% for ETLZ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUS3.DE and ETLZ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer