IUS2.DE vs. QDVH.DE
IUS2.DE (iShares S&P U.S. Banks UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and QDVH.DE (iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Financials Equities funds from iShares - IUS2.DE tracks the S&P 900 Banks 7/4 Capped while QDVH.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUS2.DE returned 5.75%/yr vs 8.98%/yr for QDVH.DE. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUS2.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QDVH.DE.
Performance
IUS2.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUS2.DE achieves a 4.22% return, which is significantly higher than QDVH.DE's -4.21% return.
IUS2.DE
- 1D
- 3.48%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 4.22%
- 6M
- 7.92%
- 1Y
- 25.71%
- 3Y*
- 22.96%
- 5Y*
- 5.75%
- 10Y*
- —
QDVH.DE
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- -4.21%
- 6M
- -2.14%
- 1Y
- 2.40%
- 3Y*
- 15.33%
- 5Y*
- 8.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
IUS2.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUS2.DE iShares S&P U.S. Banks UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 4.22% | 8.89% | 33.51% | -6.27% | -14.40% | 53.00% | -20.33% | 37.52% | -20.65% |
QDVH.DE iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | -4.21% | 3.01% | 37.13% | 8.44% | -6.23% | 48.50% | -12.20% | 35.41% | -11.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUS2.DE and QDVH.DE is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2018 | 0.88 |
The correlation between IUS2.DE and QDVH.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUS2.DE vs. QDVH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IUS2.DE
QDVH.DE
IUS2.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P U.S. Banks UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUS2.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUS2.DE | QDVH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.03 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 0.14 | +1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.72 | 0.33 | +4.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUS2.DE | QDVH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 0.13 | +1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.49 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.48 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
IUS2.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUS2.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.73%, which is greater than QDVH.DE's maximum drawdown of -42.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUS2.DE and QDVH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUS2.DE | QDVH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.73% | -42.39% | -7.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.73% | -12.76% | -1.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.32% | -21.72% | -10.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.08% | -21.72% | -26.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.92% | -9.46% | +5.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.24% | -7.90% | -8.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.44% | 5.55% | -0.11% |
Volatility
IUS2.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P U.S. Banks UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUS2.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVH.DE) at 4.30%. This indicates that IUS2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUS2.DE | QDVH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 4.30% | +1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.40% | 10.53% | +4.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.99% | 14.63% | +6.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.98% | 18.23% | +8.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.10% | 20.90% | +9.20% |
IUS2.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUS2.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVH.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUS2.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUS2.DE nor QDVH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUS2.DE and QDVH.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVH.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVH.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IUS2.DE.
IUS2.DE tracks S&P 900 Banks 7/4 Capped, while QDVH.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IUS2.DE and 0.15% for QDVH.DE.
Find the right allocation for IUS2.DE and QDVH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer