PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IUQF.L vs. USDV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IUQF.L vs. USDV.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

IUQF.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and USDV.L (SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - IUQF.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while USDV.L tracks the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUQF.L returned 12.33%/yr vs 7.81%/yr for USDV.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUQF.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for USDV.L.

Performance

IUQF.L vs. USDV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUQF.L is traded in GBp, while USDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the USDV.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUQF.L achieves a 9.22% return, which is significantly lower than USDV.L's 11.92% return.

IUQF.L

1D
-0.80%
1M
0.89%
YTD
9.22%
6M
9.49%
1Y
23.62%
3Y*
17.07%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*
—

USDV.L

1D
0.33%
1M
4.00%
YTD
11.92%
6M
12.84%
1Y
19.94%
3Y*
9.34%
5Y*
7.81%
10Y*
9.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUQF.L vs. USDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUQF.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		9.22%4.83%24.33%23.81%-11.33%29.25%12.16%29.08%-2.19%-8.50%
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis		11.92%1.15%9.34%-3.51%11.56%26.74%-2.72%18.93%1.52%5.36%

Correlation

The correlation between IUQF.L and USDV.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2016

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between IUQF.L and USDV.L has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IUQF.L vs. USDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IUQF.L
USDV.L

Technology

39.6%
12.1%

Financial Services

10.9%
12.0%

Communication Services

10.8%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
5.1%

Healthcare

8.6%
7.5%

Industrials

7.5%
17.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
16.3%

Energy

3.0%
3.1%

Utilities

2.1%
14.2%

Basic Materials

1.9%
5.4%

Real Estate

1.8%
4.5%

Technology

IUQF.L
39.6%
USDV.L
12.1%

Financial Services

IUQF.L
10.9%
USDV.L
12.0%

Communication Services

IUQF.L
10.8%
USDV.L
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IUQF.L
9.6%
USDV.L
5.1%

Healthcare

IUQF.L
8.6%
USDV.L
7.5%

Industrials

IUQF.L
7.5%
USDV.L
17.3%

Consumer Defensive

IUQF.L
4.5%
USDV.L
16.3%

Energy

IUQF.L
3.0%
USDV.L
3.1%

Utilities

IUQF.L
2.1%
USDV.L
14.2%

Basic Materials

IUQF.L
1.9%
USDV.L
5.4%

Real Estate

IUQF.L
1.8%
USDV.L
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis

Often compared with IUQF.L:
IUQF.L vs. IWFQ.LIUQF.L vs. QUALIUQF.L vs. SPYIUQF.L vs. QQQIUQF.L vs. VUSA.LIUQF.L vs. CEMQ.DEIUQF.L vs. JQUA
Often compared with USDV.L:
USDV.L vs. SCHDUSDV.L vs. UDVD.LUSDV.L vs. SPYUSDV.L vs. VOOUSDV.L vs. XUHY.LUSDV.L vs. QDIVUSDV.L vs. VUAA.L

Return for Risk

IUQF.L vs. USDV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IUQF.L
IUQF.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IUQF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUQF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUQF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IUQF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUQF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
USDV.L
USDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
USDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
USDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
USDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUQF.L vs. USDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IUQF.LUSDV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.29
2.08

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.15
3.04

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.36

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

3.01

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.46

7.69

+5.77

IUQF.L vs. USDV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUQF.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the USDV.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUQF.L and USDV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUQF.L vs. USDV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUQF.L drawdown since its inception was -25.74%, smaller than the maximum USDV.L drawdown of -37.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUQF.L and USDV.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IUQF.LUSDV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.74%

-37.29%

+11.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.64%

-6.60%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.67%

-16.30%

-4.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.67%

-16.30%

-4.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-27.79%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

0.00%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.49%

-7.45%

-0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

2.59%

-0.84%

Volatility

IUQF.L vs. USDV.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L) has a higher volatility of 2.76% compared to SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) at 2.34%. This indicates that IUQF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IUQF.LUSDV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

2.34%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.24%

7.13%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.28%

9.61%

+0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.23%

12.79%

+7.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.66%

15.17%

+13.49%

IUQF.L vs. USDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUQF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than USDV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

IUQF.L vs. USDV.L - Dividend Comparison

IUQF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUQF.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis		2.01%2.20%1.99%2.28%2.11%2.13%2.57%2.07%2.19%1.85%1.65%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

IUQF.L and USDV.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUQF.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUQF.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USDV.L.

IUQF.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while USDV.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUQF.L and 0.35% for USDV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUQF.L and USDV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer