IUQF.L vs. UC99.L
IUQF.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and UC99.L (UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from iShares and UBS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUQF.L returned 11.54%/yr vs 12.76%/yr for UC99.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUQF.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for UC99.L.
Performance
IUQF.L vs. UC99.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUQF.L achieves a 9.58% return, which is significantly lower than UC99.L's 10.79% return.
IUQF.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- 6M
- 8.62%
- YTD
- 9.58%
- 1Y
- 19.40%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.87%
UC99.L
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 10.79%
- 1Y
- 23.86%
- 3Y*
- 17.49%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.33%
IUQF.L vs. UC99.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUQF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.58% | 4.83% | 24.33% | 23.81% | -11.33% | 29.25% | 12.16% | 29.08% | -2.19% | -8.50% |
UC99.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 10.79% | 9.22% | 23.54% | 28.83% | -14.41% | 29.84% | 17.71% | 33.68% | 1.70% | 14.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUQF.L and UC99.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2016 | 0.90 |
The correlation between IUQF.L and UC99.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
IUQF.L vs. UC99.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUQF.L
UC99.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Technology
IUQF.L
UC99.L
Financial Services
IUQF.L
UC99.L
Communication Services
IUQF.L
UC99.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUQF.L
UC99.L
Healthcare
IUQF.L
UC99.L
Industrials
IUQF.L
UC99.L
Consumer Defensive
IUQF.L
UC99.L
Energy
IUQF.L
UC99.L
-
Utilities
IUQF.L
UC99.L
Basic Materials
IUQF.L
UC99.L
Real Estate
IUQF.L
UC99.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUQF.L vs. UC99.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUQF.L
UC99.L
IUQF.L vs. UC99.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUQF.L | UC99.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.34 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 2.56 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.83 | 9.16 | +1.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUQF.L vs. UC99.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUQF.L drawdown since its inception was -25.74%, which is greater than UC99.L's maximum drawdown of -23.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUQF.L and UC99.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUQF.L | UC99.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.74% | -23.04% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.64% | -9.29% | +2.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.67% | -23.04% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.67% | -23.04% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -2.10% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.45% | -4.01% | -3.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 2.60% | -0.81% |
Volatility
IUQF.L vs. UC99.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L) is 3.26%, while UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC99.L) has a volatility of 3.76%. This indicates that IUQF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC99.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUQF.L | UC99.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.26% | 3.76% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.16% | 9.00% | -1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.34% | 12.53% | -2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.23% | 16.11% | +4.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.57% | 16.39% | +12.18% |
IUQF.L vs. UC99.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUQF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than UC99.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUQF.L vs. UC99.L - Dividend Comparison
IUQF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UC99.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUQF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UC99.L UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Quality UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.85% | 0.79% | 0.78% | 0.98% | 0.78% | 1.27% | 0.93% | 1.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, IUQF.L and UC99.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IUQF.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUQF.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UC99.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUQF.L and 0.25% for UC99.L.
Find the right allocation for IUQF.L and UC99.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer