IUQF.L vs. SUUS.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

IUQF.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and SUUS.L (iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from iShares tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUQF.L returned 12.33%/yr vs 12.14%/yr for SUUS.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

IUQF.L vs. SUUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L) and iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUQF.L achieves a 9.22% return, which is significantly lower than SUUS.L's 16.12% return.

IUQF.L

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 9.22%
• 6M: 9.49%
• 1Y: 23.62%
• 3Y*: 17.07%
• 5Y*: 12.33%
• 10Y*: —

SUUS.L

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 3.99%
• YTD: 16.12%
• 6M: 16.39%
• 1Y: 27.42%
• 3Y*: 15.42%
• 5Y*: 12.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUQF.L vs. SUUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IUQF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	9.22%	4.83%	24.33%	23.81%	-11.33%	29.25%	12.16%	29.08%	-2.19%	-8.50%
SUUS.L iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	16.12%	3.44%	15.85%	17.58%	-8.97%	32.89%	21.52%	27.36%	2.89%	12.51%

Correlation

The correlation between IUQF.L and SUUS.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2016	0.86

The correlation between IUQF.L and SUUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUQF.L vs. SUUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IUQF.L	SUUS.L
Technology	39.6%	38.4%
Financial Services	10.9%	12.0%
Communication Services	10.8%	9.7%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	10.6%
Healthcare	8.6%	9.3%
Industrials	7.5%	7.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	5.3%
Energy	3.0%	0.3%
Utilities	2.1%	2.9%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.8%
Real Estate	1.8%	2.0%

Return for Risk

IUQF.L vs. SUUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUQF.L

IUQF.L Risk / Return Rank: 80
IUQF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
IUQF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
IUQF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 81
IUQF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
IUQF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

SUUS.L

SUUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 80
SUUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
SUUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
SUUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 79
SUUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
SUUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUQF.L vs. SUUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L) and iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IUQF.L	SUUS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	2.28	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	3.13	+0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.41	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.54	3.78	-0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.46	12.84	+0.61

IUQF.L vs. SUUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUQF.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the SUUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUQF.L and SUUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IUQF.L vs. SUUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUQF.L drawdown since its inception was -25.74%, roughly equal to the maximum SUUS.L drawdown of -25.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUQF.L and SUUS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IUQF.L	SUUS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.74%	-25.46%	-0.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.64%	-7.22%	+0.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.67%	-21.62%	+0.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.67%	-21.62%	+0.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.91%	-0.89%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.49%	-6.37%	-1.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	2.13%	-0.38%

Volatility

IUQF.L vs. SUUS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L) is 2.76%, while iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that IUQF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IUQF.L	SUUS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.76%	4.03%	-1.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.24%	9.13%	-1.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.28%	11.98%	-1.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.23%	20.18%	+0.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.66%	20.01%	+8.65%

IUQF.L vs. SUUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IUQF.L and SUUS.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IUQF.L vs. SUUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUQF.L nor SUUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IUQF.L and SUUS.L in my portfolio?

IUQF.L and SUUS.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IUQF.L or SUUS.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IUQF.L or SUUS.L?

IUQF.L and SUUS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

What is the main difference between IUQF.L and SUUS.L?

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD.