PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUQF.L vs. IUVF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUQF.L vs. IUVF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS (IUVF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUQF.L achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly lower than IUVF.L's 39.00% return.


IUQF.L

1D
-1.09%
1M
-0.40%
6M
6.93%
YTD
9.54%
1Y
19.04%
3Y*
16.37%
5Y*
11.76%
10Y*

IUVF.L

1D
0.11%
1M
-5.16%
6M
32.06%
YTD
39.00%
1Y
69.68%
3Y*
27.21%
5Y*
16.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUQF.L vs. IUVF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUQF.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
9.54%4.83%24.33%23.81%-11.33%29.25%12.16%29.08%-2.19%-8.50%
IUVF.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS
39.00%23.92%8.23%8.28%-4.63%31.29%-4.75%22.11%-7.17%10.45%

Correlation

The correlation between IUQF.L and IUVF.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2016

0.73

The correlation between IUQF.L and IUVF.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IUQF.L vs. IUVF.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUQF.L
IUVF.L

Technology

39.3%
42.5%

Financial Services

11.2%
9.8%

Communication Services

10.9%
9.6%

Healthcare

9.2%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
10.5%

Industrials

7.4%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
4.3%

Energy

2.9%
3.0%

Utilities

2.1%
1.9%

Basic Materials

2.0%
1.4%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

IUQF.L
39.3%
IUVF.L
42.5%

Financial Services

IUQF.L
11.2%
IUVF.L
9.8%

Communication Services

IUQF.L
10.9%
IUVF.L
9.6%

Healthcare

IUQF.L
9.2%
IUVF.L
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IUQF.L
9.1%
IUVF.L
10.5%

Industrials

IUQF.L
7.4%
IUVF.L
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

IUQF.L
4.3%
IUVF.L
4.3%

Energy

IUQF.L
2.9%
IUVF.L
3.0%

Utilities

IUQF.L
2.1%
IUVF.L
1.9%

Basic Materials

IUQF.L
2.0%
IUVF.L
1.4%

Real Estate

IUQF.L
1.8%
IUVF.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUQF.L vs. IUVF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUQF.L
IUQF.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IUQF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUQF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUQF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IUQF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUQF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IUVF.L
IUVF.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IUVF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUVF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUVF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IUVF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUVF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUQF.L vs. IUVF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS (IUVF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUQF.LIUVF.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.70

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

8.11

-5.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.66

31.72

-21.07

IUQF.L vs. IUVF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUQF.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the IUVF.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUQF.L and IUVF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUQF.L vs. IUVF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUQF.L drawdown since its inception was -25.74%, smaller than the maximum IUVF.L drawdown of -31.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUQF.L and IUVF.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUQF.LIUVF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.74%

-31.83%

+6.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.64%

-8.55%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.67%

-20.13%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.67%

-20.13%

-0.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.11%

-8.44%

+6.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.45%

-5.50%

-1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

2.19%

-0.41%

Volatility

IUQF.L vs. IUVF.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L) is 3.26%, while iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS (IUVF.L) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that IUQF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUVF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUQF.LIUVF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

7.76%

-4.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.34%

15.09%

-7.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.39%

17.43%

-7.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.24%

16.41%

+3.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.58%

18.06%

+10.52%

IUQF.L vs. IUVF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IUQF.L and IUVF.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUQF.L vs. IUVF.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IUQF.L nor IUVF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IUQF.L and IUVF.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUQF.L and IUVF.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

IUQF.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IUVF.L is Large Cap Value Equities. IUQF.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while IUVF.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUQF.L and IUVF.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer