IUQF.L vs. IUMF.L
IUQF.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IUMF.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUQF.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while IUMF.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUQF.L returned 13.13%/yr vs 15.33%/yr for IUMF.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
IUQF.L vs. IUMF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUQF.L achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly lower than IUMF.L's 29.89% return.
IUQF.L
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 9.14%
- 6M
- 9.03%
- 1Y
- 23.17%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- —
IUMF.L
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- 13.21%
- YTD
- 29.89%
- 6M
- 29.09%
- 1Y
- 40.90%
- 3Y*
- 28.84%
- 5Y*
- 15.33%
- 10Y*
- —
IUQF.L vs. IUMF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUQF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.14% | 4.83% | 24.33% | 23.81% | -11.33% | 29.25% | 12.16% | 29.08% | -1.58% | 11.25% |
IUMF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF | 29.89% | 9.14% | 34.88% | 3.73% | -8.43% | 14.11% | 25.03% | 23.31% | 2.39% | 24.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUQF.L and IUMF.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2016 | 0.81 |
The correlation between IUQF.L and IUMF.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.81 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUQF.L vs. IUMF.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUQF.L
IUMF.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
IUQF.L
IUMF.L
Financial Services
IUQF.L
IUMF.L
Communication Services
IUQF.L
IUMF.L
Healthcare
IUQF.L
IUMF.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUQF.L
IUMF.L
Industrials
IUQF.L
IUMF.L
Consumer Defensive
IUQF.L
IUMF.L
Energy
IUQF.L
IUMF.L
Real Estate
IUQF.L
IUMF.L
Utilities
IUQF.L
IUMF.L
Basic Materials
IUQF.L
IUMF.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUQF.L vs. IUMF.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUQF.L
IUMF.L
IUQF.L vs. IUMF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IUMF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUQF.L | IUMF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.40 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | 4.37 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.01 | 14.10 | -1.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUQF.L | IUMF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 2.26 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.84 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
IUQF.L vs. IUMF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUQF.L drawdown since its inception was -25.74%, roughly equal to the maximum IUMF.L drawdown of -25.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUQF.L and IUMF.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUQF.L | IUMF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.74% | -25.23% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.64% | -9.32% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.18% | -22.56% | +2.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.18% | -24.37% | +4.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.75% | +1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.97% | -6.44% | +2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 2.89% | -1.11% |
Volatility
IUQF.L vs. IUMF.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L) is 2.63%, while iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (IUMF.L) has a volatility of 7.86%. This indicates that IUQF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUMF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUQF.L | IUMF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 7.86% | -5.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.06% | 15.09% | -8.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.17% | 17.99% | -7.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 18.29% | -3.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 18.66% | -2.86% |
IUQF.L vs. IUMF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IUQF.L and IUMF.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUQF.L vs. IUMF.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUQF.L nor IUMF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUQF.L and IUMF.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUQF.L and IUMF.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
IUQF.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IUMF.L is Momentum. IUQF.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while IUMF.L tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index.
Find the right allocation for IUQF.L and IUMF.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer