IUQF.L vs. IITU.L
IUQF.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IUQF.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUQF.L returned 13.13%/yr vs 25.50%/yr for IITU.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUQF.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.
Performance
IUQF.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUQF.L achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 23.25% return.
IUQF.L
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 9.14%
- 6M
- 9.03%
- 1Y
- 23.17%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- —
IITU.L
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 23.25%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- 53.38%
- 3Y*
- 30.94%
- 5Y*
- 25.50%
- 10Y*
- 27.26%
IUQF.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUQF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.14% | 4.83% | 24.33% | 23.81% | -11.33% | 29.25% | 12.16% | 29.08% | -1.58% | 11.25% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 23.25% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUQF.L and IITU.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2016 | 0.84 |
The correlation between IUQF.L and IITU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUQF.L vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUQF.L
IITU.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
IUQF.L
IITU.L
Financial Services
IUQF.L
IITU.L
-
Communication Services
IUQF.L
IITU.L
-
Healthcare
IUQF.L
IITU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
IUQF.L
IITU.L
-
Industrials
IUQF.L
IITU.L
Consumer Defensive
IUQF.L
IITU.L
-
Energy
IUQF.L
IITU.L
Real Estate
IUQF.L
IITU.L
-
Utilities
IUQF.L
IITU.L
-
Basic Materials
IUQF.L
IITU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUQF.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUQF.L
IITU.L
IUQF.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUQF.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.44 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | 3.17 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.01 | 8.17 | +4.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUQF.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 2.71 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 1.16 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 1.23 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
IUQF.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUQF.L drawdown since its inception was -25.74%, smaller than the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUQF.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUQF.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.74% | -28.03% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.64% | -16.76% | +10.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.18% | -28.03% | +7.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.18% | -28.03% | +7.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.89% | +2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.97% | -5.14% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 6.51% | -4.73% |
Volatility
IUQF.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L) is 2.63%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that IUQF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUQF.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 7.01% | -4.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.06% | 14.45% | -7.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.17% | 19.60% | -9.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 21.94% | -7.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 21.31% | -5.51% |
IUQF.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUQF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUQF.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUQF.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUQF.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUQF.L.
IUQF.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. IUQF.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUQF.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.
Find the right allocation for IUQF.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer