IUQF.L vs. FEX.L
IUQF.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and FEX.L (First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A USD) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from iShares and First Trust respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUQF.L returned 13.13%/yr vs 12.00%/yr for FEX.L. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUQF.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FEX.L.
Performance
IUQF.L vs. FEX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUQF.L achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly lower than FEX.L's 14.35% return.
IUQF.L
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 9.14%
- 6M
- 9.03%
- 1Y
- 23.17%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- —
FEX.L
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 14.35%
- 6M
- 14.52%
- 1Y
- 30.14%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 12.00%
- 10Y*
- 13.54%
IUQF.L vs. FEX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUQF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.14% | 4.83% | 24.33% | 23.81% | -11.33% | 29.25% | 12.16% | 29.08% | -1.58% | 11.25% |
FEX.L First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A USD | 14.35% | 7.34% | 18.68% | 8.36% | -1.83% | 28.60% | 9.66% | 22.13% | -5.90% | 10.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUQF.L and FEX.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2016 | 0.88 |
The correlation between IUQF.L and FEX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (3 years) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IUQF.L vs. FEX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUQF.L
FEX.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
IUQF.L
FEX.L
Financial Services
IUQF.L
FEX.L
Communication Services
IUQF.L
FEX.L
Healthcare
IUQF.L
FEX.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUQF.L
FEX.L
Industrials
IUQF.L
FEX.L
Consumer Defensive
IUQF.L
FEX.L
Energy
IUQF.L
FEX.L
Real Estate
IUQF.L
FEX.L
Utilities
IUQF.L
FEX.L
Basic Materials
IUQF.L
FEX.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUQF.L vs. FEX.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUQF.L
FEX.L
IUQF.L vs. FEX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L) and First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A USD (FEX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUQF.L | FEX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.50 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | 6.48 | -3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.01 | 20.58 | -7.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUQF.L | FEX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 2.78 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.83 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.83 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
IUQF.L vs. FEX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUQF.L drawdown since its inception was -25.74%, smaller than the maximum FEX.L drawdown of -31.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUQF.L and FEX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUQF.L | FEX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.74% | -31.58% | +5.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.64% | -4.63% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.18% | -21.34% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.18% | -21.34% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.08% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.97% | -4.11% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 1.46% | +0.32% |
Volatility
IUQF.L vs. FEX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L) is 2.63%, while First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A USD (FEX.L) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that IUQF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUQF.L | FEX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 3.61% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.06% | 7.22% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.17% | 10.80% | -0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 14.53% | +0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 16.45% | -0.65% |
IUQF.L vs. FEX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUQF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FEX.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUQF.L vs. FEX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUQF.L nor FEX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUQF.L and FEX.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUQF.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUQF.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FEX.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUQF.L and 0.75% for FEX.L.
Find the right allocation for IUQF.L and FEX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer