IUQF.L vs. DGRG.L
IUQF.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and DGRG.L (WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - IUQF.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while DGRG.L tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUQF.L returned 13.13%/yr vs 12.91%/yr for DGRG.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUQF.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for DGRG.L.
Performance
IUQF.L vs. DGRG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUQF.L achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly higher than DGRG.L's 6.87% return.
IUQF.L
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 9.14%
- 6M
- 9.03%
- 1Y
- 23.17%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRG.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 6.87%
- 6M
- 6.31%
- 1Y
- 21.18%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 12.91%
- 10Y*
- —
IUQF.L vs. DGRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUQF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.14% | 4.83% | 24.33% | 23.81% | -11.33% | 29.25% | 12.16% | 29.08% | -1.58% | 11.25% |
DGRG.L WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 6.87% | 5.60% | 20.13% | 12.11% | 2.74% | 26.71% | 8.76% | 24.78% | -1.18% | 15.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUQF.L and DGRG.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2016 | 0.93 |
The correlation between IUQF.L and DGRG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
IUQF.L vs. DGRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUQF.L
DGRG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
IUQF.L
DGRG.L
Financial Services
IUQF.L
DGRG.L
Communication Services
IUQF.L
DGRG.L
Healthcare
IUQF.L
DGRG.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUQF.L
DGRG.L
Industrials
IUQF.L
DGRG.L
Consumer Defensive
IUQF.L
DGRG.L
Energy
IUQF.L
DGRG.L
Real Estate
IUQF.L
DGRG.L
-
Utilities
IUQF.L
DGRG.L
Basic Materials
IUQF.L
DGRG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUQF.L vs. DGRG.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUQF.L
DGRG.L
IUQF.L vs. DGRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (DGRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUQF.L | DGRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.43 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | 3.53 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.01 | 12.98 | +0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUQF.L | DGRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 2.38 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 1.03 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 1.01 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
IUQF.L vs. DGRG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUQF.L drawdown since its inception was -25.74%, which is greater than DGRG.L's maximum drawdown of -22.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUQF.L and DGRG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUQF.L | DGRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.74% | -22.57% | -3.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.64% | -5.98% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.18% | -17.72% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.18% | -17.72% | -2.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.97% | -2.96% | -1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 1.63% | +0.15% |
Volatility
IUQF.L vs. DGRG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L) has a higher volatility of 2.63% compared to WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (DGRG.L) at 2.40%. This indicates that IUQF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUQF.L | DGRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 2.40% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.06% | 6.19% | +0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.17% | 8.86% | +1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 12.55% | +2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 14.45% | +1.35% |
IUQF.L vs. DGRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUQF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRG.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
IUQF.L vs. DGRG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUQF.L nor DGRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUQF.L and DGRG.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUQF.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUQF.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for DGRG.L.
IUQF.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while DGRG.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUQF.L and 0.33% for DGRG.L.
Find the right allocation for IUQF.L and DGRG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer