IUQF.L vs. CSY2.DE
IUQF.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and CSY2.DE (CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - IUQF.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while CSY2.DE tracks the MSCI USA ESG Leaders. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUQF.L returned 11.54%/yr vs 13.21%/yr for CSY2.DE. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IUQF.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CSY2.DE.
Performance
IUQF.L vs. CSY2.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IUQF.L is traded in GBp, while CSY2.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CSY2.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUQF.L achieves a 9.58% return, which is significantly higher than CSY2.DE's 8.55% return.
IUQF.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- 6M
- 8.62%
- YTD
- 9.58%
- 1Y
- 19.40%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.87%
CSY2.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- 6M
- 8.47%
- YTD
- 8.55%
- 1Y
- 20.39%
- 3Y*
- 17.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.21%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.09%
IUQF.L vs. CSY2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUQF.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.58% | 4.83% | 24.33% | 23.81% | -11.33% | 29.25% | 34.51% |
CSY2.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD | 8.55% | 11.83% | 24.74% | 22.64% | -12.02% | 34.33% | 11.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUQF.L and CSY2.DE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2020 | 0.85 |
The correlation between IUQF.L and CSY2.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUQF.L vs. CSY2.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IUQF.L
CSY2.DE
IUQF.L vs. CSY2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L) and CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IUQF.L | CSY2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.29 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 2.23 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.83 | 7.85 | +2.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IUQF.L vs. CSY2.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUQF.L drawdown since its inception was -25.74%, which is greater than CSY2.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUQF.L and CSY2.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUQF.L | CSY2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.74% | -23.78% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.64% | -9.09% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.67% | -23.78% | +3.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.67% | -23.78% | +3.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -2.08% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.45% | -4.10% | -3.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 2.59% | -0.80% |
Volatility
IUQF.L vs. CSY2.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L) and CSIF (IE) MSCI USA ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY2.DE) have volatilities of 3.26% and 3.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUQF.L | CSY2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.26% | 3.35% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.16% | 8.62% | -1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.34% | 12.20% | -1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.23% | 15.91% | +4.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.57% | 18.23% | +10.34% |
IUQF.L vs. CSY2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUQF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CSY2.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUQF.L vs. CSY2.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUQF.L nor CSY2.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUQF.L and CSY2.DE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSY2.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSY2.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUQF.L.
IUQF.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while CSY2.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Credit Suisse. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUQF.L and 0.10% for CSY2.DE.
Find the right allocation for IUQF.L and CSY2.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer