PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUQD.L vs. BBUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUQD.L vs. BBUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUQD.L) and BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc (BBUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUQD.L achieves a 8.85% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS.L's 10.13% return.


IUQD.L

1D
0.85%
1M
4.85%
YTD
8.85%
6M
9.69%
1Y
21.93%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
11.94%
10Y*

BBUS.L

1D
0.07%
1M
4.56%
YTD
10.13%
6M
10.79%
1Y
27.37%
3Y*
22.24%
5Y*
13.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUQD.L vs. BBUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IUQD.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
8.85%12.64%22.37%30.89%-20.80%27.69%16.03%13.21%
BBUS.L
BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc
10.13%17.54%24.99%27.63%-19.96%27.64%20.13%12.83%

Correlation

The correlation between IUQD.L and BBUS.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019

0.96

The correlation between IUQD.L and BBUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUQD.L vs. BBUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUQD.L
BBUS.L

Technology

36.5%
39.7%

Financial Services

11.5%
10.9%

Communication Services

11.1%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
9.7%

Healthcare

9.0%
8.0%

Industrials

8.2%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.1%

Energy

4.0%
3.2%

Utilities

1.9%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.3%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.4%

Technology

IUQD.L
36.5%
BBUS.L
39.7%

Financial Services

IUQD.L
11.5%
BBUS.L
10.9%

Communication Services

IUQD.L
11.1%
BBUS.L
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IUQD.L
9.4%
BBUS.L
9.7%

Healthcare

IUQD.L
9.0%
BBUS.L
8.0%

Industrials

IUQD.L
8.2%
BBUS.L
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

IUQD.L
4.9%
BBUS.L
4.1%

Energy

IUQD.L
4.0%
BBUS.L
3.2%

Utilities

IUQD.L
1.9%
BBUS.L
2.1%

Real Estate

IUQD.L
1.8%
BBUS.L
1.3%

Basic Materials

IUQD.L
1.7%
BBUS.L
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUQD.L vs. BBUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUQD.L
IUQD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IUQD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUQD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUQD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IUQD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUQD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS.L
BBUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BBUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUQD.L vs. BBUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUQD.L) and BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc (BBUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IUQD.LBBUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.43

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

3.16

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.66

13.61

-1.95

IUQD.L vs. BBUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUQD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the BBUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUQD.L and BBUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IUQD.LBBUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

2.35

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.83

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.89

-0.13

Drawdowns

IUQD.L vs. BBUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUQD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, roughly equal to the maximum BBUS.L drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUQD.L and BBUS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUQD.LBBUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.83%

-34.26%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.26%

-8.62%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.93%

-19.35%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.75%

-25.33%

-2.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.46%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-5.40%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

2.01%

-0.13%

Volatility

IUQD.L vs. BBUS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IUQD.L) is 2.79%, while BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc (BBUS.L) has a volatility of 3.23%. This indicates that IUQD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUQD.LBBUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

3.23%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.13%

8.55%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.08%

11.59%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

16.10%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.56%

17.86%

-0.30%

IUQD.L vs. BBUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUQD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS.L's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUQD.L vs. BBUS.L - Dividend Comparison

IUQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while BBUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBUS.L
BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IUQD.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.67%0.73%0.84%1.05%1.34%0.95%1.21%1.32%1.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, IUQD.L and BBUS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BBUS.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBUS.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUQD.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUQD.L and 0.04% for BBUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUQD.L and BBUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer