IUQA.L vs. IWVL.L
IUQA.L (iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and IWVL.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IUQA.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while IWVL.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IUQA.L returned 11.91%/yr vs 16.28%/yr for IWVL.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IUQA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IWVL.L.
Performance
IUQA.L vs. IWVL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUQA.L achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly lower than IWVL.L's 34.30% return.
IUQA.L
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 4.79%
- YTD
- 8.81%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 21.84%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- —
IWVL.L
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 9.92%
- YTD
- 34.30%
- 6M
- 38.10%
- 1Y
- 66.02%
- 3Y*
- 30.35%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.86%
IUQA.L vs. IWVL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUQA.L iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 8.81% | 12.50% | 22.46% | 30.92% | -20.74% | 27.56% | 16.09% | 33.32% | -6.99% | 22.18% |
IWVL.L iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 34.30% | 40.41% | 5.13% | 19.53% | -9.79% | 20.11% | -3.67% | 18.13% | -14.03% | 22.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUQA.L and IWVL.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2016 | 0.76 |
The correlation between IUQA.L and IWVL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
IUQA.L vs. IWVL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUQA.L
IWVL.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
IUQA.L
IWVL.L
Financial Services
IUQA.L
IWVL.L
Communication Services
IUQA.L
IWVL.L
Consumer Cyclical
IUQA.L
IWVL.L
Healthcare
IUQA.L
IWVL.L
Industrials
IUQA.L
IWVL.L
Consumer Defensive
IUQA.L
IWVL.L
Energy
IUQA.L
IWVL.L
Utilities
IUQA.L
IWVL.L
Real Estate
IUQA.L
IWVL.L
Basic Materials
IUQA.L
IWVL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUQA.L vs. IWVL.L — Risk / Return Rank
IUQA.L
IWVL.L
IUQA.L vs. IWVL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUQA.L | IWVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.76 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 7.55 | -4.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.68 | 28.57 | -16.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUQA.L | IWVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 4.24 | -2.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 1.01 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.62 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
IUQA.L vs. IWVL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUQA.L drawdown since its inception was -33.96%, smaller than the maximum IWVL.L drawdown of -39.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUQA.L and IWVL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUQA.L | IWVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.96% | -39.30% | +5.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.99% | -8.74% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.04% | -14.46% | -3.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.77% | -26.55% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.91% | +0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.87% | -7.50% | +2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 2.31% | -0.45% |
Volatility
IUQA.L vs. IWVL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (IUQA.L) is 2.78%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) has a volatility of 6.56%. This indicates that IUQA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWVL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUQA.L | IWVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.78% | 6.56% | -3.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.27% | 12.94% | -4.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.27% | 15.57% | -4.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 16.05% | +0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 17.02% | -0.31% |
IUQA.L vs. IWVL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUQA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IWVL.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUQA.L vs. IWVL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IUQA.L nor IWVL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IUQA.L and IWVL.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUQA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUQA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IWVL.L.
IUQA.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IWVL.L is Global Equities. IUQA.L tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while IWVL.L tracks MSCI World Enhanced Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUQA.L and 0.25% for IWVL.L.
Find the right allocation for IUQA.L and IWVL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer